http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...d/news-story/d9919ffc3d0c94cfb4fde386bde8b760
Alleged child abusers request for bail variation rejected
SAM BUCKINGHAM-JONESTHE AUSTRALIANAPRIL 14, 2016
BS now faces 5 charges in total. Police withdrew two of the charges of sexual assault and he will face three charges of sexual intercourse with a child under 10 and two common assault charges.
BS lawyer applied for bail conditions to be relaxed ..... where as BS only had to report to police once a week but the magistrate denied the changes and BS has to continue to report to police three times a week.
He sat quietly at the back of the court flanked by supporters.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...d/news-story/d9919ffc3d0c94cfb4fde386bde8b760
Alleged child abusers request for bail variation rejected
SAM BUCKINGHAM-JONESTHE AUSTRALIANAPRIL 14, 2016
BS now faces 5 charges in total. Police withdrew two of the charges of sexual assault and he will face three charges of sexual intercourse with a child under 10 and two common assault charges.
BS lawyer applied for bail conditions to be relaxed ..... where as BS only had to report to police once a week but the magistrate denied the changes and BS has to continue to report to police three times a week.
He sat quietly at the back of the court flanked by supporters.
Would love to know who the supporters were!
Still very serious charges and am I reading that right? That his bail conditions have actually been tightened? From once to 3 x per week? if so, very, very interesting.
I'm sure MS was right by his side....
Glad the magistrate denied the requested changes.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
NO sorry if I was not real clear ...paraphrasing...grrr
His solicitor tried to get his reporting obligations reduced from 3 times a week to just once a week ..... but the magistrate said Nup no can do.... three time a week it will remain.
imo
https://au.news.yahoo.com/video/watch/31346604/bill-spedding-faces-court/#page1
Some video footage...you can see some of the supporters here too.
MS certainly looks like the boss
It seems to get deactivated whenever a new article about William hits MSM.I agree. Sometimes I also think her public posts may be in order to provoke a response from someone. The account us up and down all the time and I suspect its not random but haven't quite picked the pattern yet.
Hopefully she is getting fed up. Living life day after day, worried about being watched, followed by reporters. Has to get old. If she has kept quiet for financial reasons maybe she is finally realizing that it's just not worth it. The coffee shop alibi has always made me hinky. She knows if BS was really there, if he was at the Assembly after.......She has never publicly stated that is indeed where he was. Makes me wonder..... I think she holds a big piece of the puzzle IMO.Love the way she left old Bill to fend for himself. Maybe they should put a bit more pressure on her. Looks like she no longer wants the limelight as far as media are concerned, anyway.
I've felt that way many times and then BAM another round of information is released. Hopefully we hear more of the puzzle soon.It really feels like this case has gone cold![]()
Hopefully she is getting fed up. Living life day after day, worried about being watched, followed by reporters. Has to get old. If she has kept quiet for financial reasons maybe she is finally realizing that it's just not worth it. The coffee shop alibi has always made me hinky. She knows if BS was really there, if he was at the Assembly after.......She has never publicly stated that is indeed where he was. Makes me wonder..... I think she holds a big piece of the puzzle IMO.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
In that video she did walk off but she seemed happy and supportive. She clearly walked off to speak to someone but before while holding his hand she seemed elated, probably about dropped charges. I'm totally open to BS being possibly involved but there is nothing there to show she does not support him. It just pisses me off when things are fabricated it taken way out of context. <modsnip>
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How do we know he is still a POI in WT's case? Not saying he isn't. I was under the impression that police did not make announcements when they no longer considered a person to be a person of interest. If they were named as a suspect and then no longer considered one, I can see the police making an announcement about that. MOO
Wondering what evidence is being heard in PB's hearing at his next court date. Could it be to appeal the plea he made which was a guilty plea of convenience? Or is it the breach of his conditions? He must be pleading not guilty to the breach of conditions if there is a hearing.
http://www.criminalcle.net.au/attachments/Convenience_Pleas_Benjamin_Bickford.pdf
This link has been posted before about pleas of convenience. It's a good read.
How do we know he is still a POI in WT's case? Not saying he isn't. I was under the impression that police did not make announcements when they no longer considered a person to be a person of interest. If they were named as a suspect and then no longer considered one, I can see the police making an announcement about that. MOO
Wondering what evidence is being heard in PB's hearing at his next court date. Could it be to appeal the plea he made which was a guilty plea of convenience? Or is it the breach of his conditions? He must be pleading not guilty to the breach of conditions if there is a hearing.
http://www.criminalcle.net.au/attachments/Convenience_Pleas_Benjamin_Bickford.pdf
This link has been posted before about pleas of convenience. It's a good read.