sosocurious
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 5, 2012
- Messages
- 6,374
- Reaction score
- 16,313
This is what made me think this is not someone who has never done this before.
This has happened in the country where there is little techology.
This has happened the perfect time of the morning at the perfect time of the week (Mid morning, mid week when most people are at work or schoo
This has happened in the perfect type of street (Dead end street with houses considerably recessed back from street verge behind trees resulting resulting obscured vision of home owners)
The father had gone out and the foster child on the front drive in a perfect window of opportunity.
Only a criminal pedo would have pre thought all this pre and post abduction attributes out.
It might have been random but the window opened on a premeditated act.
Your comments reminded me of that early article. One of Jubelins first interviews from memory.
If someone took William, it is unlikely to have been their first offence, says Dr Michael Diamond, a forensic psychiatrist and criminal profiler. “You don’t just do this sort of crime for the first time,” he says. “You would have to overcome other experiential things that confront you if you are going to do something of that magnitude. Is it somebody who has access to a child, and thought about it and not done it because their contact is too obvious, and so it has been a rehearsed and lived-in fantasy without the terrible outcome?” Diamond asks.............
“The worst case is not that a body is found,” Jubelin says. “The worst case is that a body is never found.”
And so now it comes down to a struggle between Gary Jubelin, his team, and the *person who most probably abducted William Tyrrell. The bad, big-city detective versus the paedophile. “I’ll never give up,” warns the detective.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...sh-into-thin-air/story-e6frg6z6-1227308929078