SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,985
- Reaction score
- 183,409
I'm guessing the FP's had permanent guardianship as opposed to adoption based on the judge's comments that it was inexplicable why the carers were presented as parents to WT. KT knew of the arrangement. Did BC know? Did this happen while he was incarcerated? Did any other family members apply to have custody of WT? Also wondering about the 000 call if WT was known by the FP's surname? How much of it is even true? MOO
BBM
While William may have been known by his foster parents last name (to make things easier in their community, to help keep his foster care privacy intact), his legal name would still be Tyrrell .... until/if any adoption took place.
I can understand a report to police using his legal name, as it is an official entity.
I think the foster parents are intelligent people, and understand when to use his legal name and when to use their own surname for day to day practicality and privacy.
The 000 call recording ...
[video=youtube;augkwdaYOx8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=augkwdaYOx8[/video]