But in reality, what does Natalie's suitability as the carer of her grandchildren have to do with this missing child case? And police state 'distraction' as a 'reason' for why it had never been disclosed that the child was in fostercare when he disappeared. And now look? The news finally breaks that the child was in care at the time of his disappearance, and what are we talking about?
Instead of this news opening up a potential door to learn more details and potentially gather more evidence, we are instead talking, and the news is now talking, and naming, what is wrong with the bio family, what possible reasons there were 2.5 years prior to WT's disappearance for why he was taken into care, who initiated him being taken into care, why the paternal grandparent wasn't a suitable candidate for fostering her own grandchild, whether or not the bio parents are actually back together now, what kind of addiction and criminal activities the bio parents may have been participating in over the years, both before and after WT's removal from their home, and etc. Talk about a distraction? And talk about a puppetmaster?
The whole focus of this ruling, was that the majority of the interested population now knows that the people caring for WT on that fateful morning, were people unknown, people who have not even *still* been named. All this time, the majority have believed what they have been led to believe, that WT went missing from his bio family's care. That is huge for them to now discover different details, which were felt SO important to continue to cover up, that they took it to the supreme court of the land. I wonder how much that cost taxpayers - between police, FACS, and the courts, to have to deal with this detail which was felt to be SO important to hide? And now it appears they have got MSM wrapped around their finger in still continuing to report the FPs as the parents, name the bios but yet not the FPs, bring out all the dirty laundry about the bios, and etc. - distraction indeed.
I really really hope that that persevering, persistent woman who did not back down with threats of lawsuits and even appeals, follows through with her quest for a Coronial Inquest, and succeeds in this case.