I am confused. Are you saying that as far as the laws and what the media are allowed to do, it's okay for the media to vilify in national media as a potential sex offender, someone who has never been convicted of sex offences, and bash them about for years as a person of interest in a missing child case without ever being charged, a case which has been touted to reportedly suspect pedophilic motives... but yet on the other hand, men who have actually been convicted of sex offences/child sex offences are protected from being named in the news??
I know that the monster Hillsley(sp?) has been named in the news in regard to his offences, and Daniel Morcombe's sexually deviant killer has been named? And that priest (Nicols?), and Bickford, and TJ.. have all been announced in media in regard to their convictions.. and now we also have Donohoe who has been named as a convicted sex offender.. they have even now named PS in relation to a potential stalking scenario, so what is the determining factor as to when a convicted offender can be named, and when he cannot be named?