What is that a law or something ?? Please elaborate
Yes I have seen many foster parents mention this.
What is that a law or something ?? Please elaborate
I am just wondering under what legal circumstances the Foster Parents will be named and identified. It seems to me the fact they can't be identified is a huge disadvantage to the investigation. Always has been . Did I read in an earlier thread the FM made sure this protection was in place before details of William's disappearance was announced to the media? I am sure I read that somewhere????
That was Justice Brereton's Ruling in the Supreme Court where they (FFamily) were given an opportunity but argued against it.I thought someone mentioned in a prior thread that the orders were lifted but they chose not to identify themselves?
Im worried that the foster family were directing the narrative, the theory of "abduction", the theory of "paedophile" could this be to explain anything that they might discover if the body was actually found back then,
The BS theory, could the foster family hav found out by Facebook that the real grandmother was friends with a woman who is friends with BS's family, were they hoping the narrative would follow that direction
I wonder what ever happened to the washing machine did the foster family blame him from the start and got another washing machine repair man
What is that a law or something ?? Please elaborate
100% agree with this. In any circumstance, always get the best lawyer you can afford.
I think another motivation could be around the adoption process of the sister, if birth mother is on the scene and WT birth perents doesn't want adoption to proceed with him, whats the situation with adoption of the sister if she can't adopt WT dose that mean she can't adopt the sister as they were placed as a sibling unit, im just thinking if the sister is in a situation that she can be adoptable maby the birth mother has lost rights to decide, but the birth mother is still able to be included in WT adoption status, either way I think all the motivation is around being able to keep the sister and proceed to adoption, she has also said that she didn't bond with WT I think that was odd that she even mentioned itWasn't with him 4 days a week.
Didn't sleep in same room with him
FF mentioned that William was His world and vice versa
FF did all of the feeding and nappy changing early on
FM talked about giving up on William
FM talks about William as being full of beans and boisterous, rather than quiet and compliant like the FD?
Maybe she didn't like him that much but couldn't give him back because then they would probably want to take the FD too.
Looks like motive to me.
JMO
IMO, this information is far too specific for NSWPOL just to be shaking the tree. No Cookies | Daily Telegraph
Missing toddler William Tyrrell: 'We hope he is still alive'
"The mother of missing toddler William Tyrrell says she has a vision in her head that somebody "reached over and ... has gone 'clump' on his shoulders, picked him up and moved him on ... because ... that's the only way ... to explain for him not to be there"."
There are probably "hundreds" of alternate ways to explain for William not to be there IMO with many discussions here.
"I had a vision in my head.
I don't know why, but I have a vision in my head, somebody, I'd, I can't explain it..." and then goes on to explain it?
Also noteworthy is the change from past tense "HAD" to present tense "HAVE".
Alternating between tenses raises a Red Flag for me.
Present tense may be indicative of storytelling. IMO.
IMO the FPs tried very hard to set BS up as the patsy.
Does anyone else here think police are just putting forward the ‘balcony fall’ theory as a way to get the FM to admit to a lesser crime (ie hiding a body misleading police etc), and start talking, when they actually think she lashed out in anger and killed him in a blitz attack?
I find that BGM paints a very rosy image of her son constantly and often to me it sounds like she's ignoring things she doesn't want to see. Like anyone, I don't believe everything they say.
Does anyone else here think police are just putting forward the ‘balcony fall’ theory as a way to get the FM to admit to a lesser crime (ie hiding a body misleading police etc), and start talking, when they actually think she lashed out in anger and killed him in a blitz attack?