FromGermany1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2021
- Messages
- 3,629
- Reaction score
- 27,577
Honestly, I don't understand the thing with little W's shoes. I'm often a little (?) slow-witted, sorry. Why did FFC have to dump his shoes at all? Because she (stupidly) stated, he had shoes on, when he disappeared, although he hadn't? If he was "kidnapped", that could have theoretically happened without his shoes, after playing on the grass barefoot. Whether little W indeed was playing, we don't know of course, as so many other details of this case.
If FFC didn't want her husband to know of ongoing things during his absence, had the shoes to disappear because of him? Wouldn't the MFC have believed, the boy vanished without shoes?
If FFC didn't want her husband to know of ongoing things during his absence, had the shoes to disappear because of him? Wouldn't the MFC have believed, the boy vanished without shoes?