From the article, it seems mitochondrial (maternal) DNA may still be possible to obtain and determine. Iirc, it takes time to run those tests. How long after discovering Adrienne did they announce it was her confirmed by dna? Iirc it was a short time. Hair still attached to the skull maybe? For sure, teeth if available. It was reported that all parts weren't intact and we don't know if that means parts are missing or separated. If so, LE would try to determine if the missing parts were purposeful or happened due to the wash. They did conduct extensive searches over the next few days following Adrienne's recovery. No report on if they found additional evidence afaik.
The purpose of my post was to write down what science says is possible and try to fit what we know about this case into that information.
Mitochondrial DNA - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm not a science person either and noticed a slight error I made in adding up the days of the stages too! But the point is, she was found after enough time went by to hinder determining anything from the discovery of her body. One thought is that someone wanted to relieve her family from the agony of not knowing if Adrienne was dead or alive but didn't want that to happen prior to any possible evidence being washed away. Someone could potentially have waited until the skeleton reached the dry bone stage. Of course this theory would mean Adrienne died at the hand of someone who is close to her or perhaps a local who, for whatever reason, wanted her found.
Since the flooding occurred on July 21 (correct?), why wasn't she discovered until another two weeks passed beyond that date?
Just imo, foreign DNA is unlikely.