AZ AZ - Lukeville, HispMale 16-20, UP120409, In desert near migrant trails, some dentals available, Apr'12

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

ChatteringBirds

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2019
Messages
10,212
Reaction score
51,798
120409_189338.png

UNIDENTIFIED
Unidentified Person / NamUs #UP120409
Male, Hispanic / Latino
Date Body Found: April 9, 2012
Location Found: Lukeville, Arizona
ME/C Case Number: ML12-00848
Biological Sex: Male
Race / Ethnicity: Hispanic / Latino
Estimated Age Group: Late Teen/Young Adult
Estimated Age Range (Years): 16-20
Estimated Year of Death: 2010-2011
Height/Weight: Cannot Estimate
NamUs Case Created: April 19, 2024
ME/C QA Reviewed: June 16, 2012
Location Found: Lukeville, Arizona 85341
County: Pima County
GPS Coordinates (Not Mapped):
N 31 57.502 W 112 52.935

Circumstances of Recovery:
Cranium was discovered by a National Park Officer in the desert near Lukeville, AZ in an area with known migrant trails.

Condition of Remains:
Not recognizable - Partial skeletal parts only

Other distinctive physical characteristic:
Some dental restorations. See Dental page for more information
 
Shapes of lips between Antonio Ramirez Lopez and this boy are close

But there's a bunch of NamUs files for missing young male migrants with no pictures. John Doe could be one of them.

And it seems like Lukeville John Doe already had a NamUs file: The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)

View attachment 499056View attachment 499057
The NamUs page for John Doe in my comment seems to have been removed, but the second and newer file that ChatteringBirds put is still up.
 
@iulia were any missing persons removed around the same time the NamUs file for Lukeville John Doe was removed? I know his second file is still up, but I'm just curious.
Honestly, I don't know what happened here, but I've never had that profile in my file. It wasn't public when I created my file, I checked an older version of my file and it wasn't there either. I just checked all Arizona cases one by one and I have no discrepancies.

Only thing I can think of is the old profile was made public and subsequently removed between my checks. This wouldn't influence the totals, since it wasn't a resolved case, and I would totally miss it. It happens on the MP side for sure. I can't be sure though, never ran into this issue before. :)
 
Honestly, I don't know what happened here, but I've never had that profile in my file. It wasn't public when I created my file, I checked an older version of my file and it wasn't there either. I just checked all Arizona cases one by one and I have no discrepancies.

Only thing I can think of is the old profile was made public and subsequently removed between my checks. This wouldn't influence the totals, since it wasn't a resolved case, and I would totally miss it. It happens on the MP side for sure. I can't be sure though, never ran into this issue before. :)
Thanks for clarifying. I think the investigators realized they accidentally made two files of the same Doe and decided to remove one of them.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
165
Guests online
2,403
Total visitors
2,568

Forum statistics

Threads
603,513
Messages
18,157,723
Members
231,755
Latest member
babycakes15
Back
Top