GUILTY AZ - Michael, 44, & Tina Careccia, 42, Maricopa, 22 June 2015 - #1 *Arrest*

[JoCoKSEyes]

Did he respond "no" when asked if his dad has any tattoos or scars???


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wonder why. Also strange.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[nervous_nellie]

I haven't looked up the house in property records, but according to the PI on the case he had 14 occupants to interview. That is definitely a full house if the couple makes 16.

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news...ility-in-couples-disappearance-abrk/29537059/

and where in the blazes were they Sunday night thru Monday 5am. ?? Seems that it should be almost impossible to come or go from the compound without someone seeing...

 

[JoCoKSEyes]

That's interesting. He wanted to report his father missing, but he doesn't mention Tina until the 911 operator asked if Mike was with someone.
Why wouldn't he mention that Tina was missing as well from the beginning?
IMOO.

"His wife". Not very endearing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[CatsInTheCradle]

Did he respond "no" when asked if his dad has any tattoos or scars???


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I thought he said no as well.

 

[nervous_nellie]

I wonder why. Also strange.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think the dispatcher asked about VISIBLE tatoos...

 

[nervous_nellie]

"His wife". Not very endearing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh man, exactly what I thought

 

[JoCoKSEyes]

I think the dispatcher asked about VISIBLE tatoos...

True. But if it was your relative, and you knew about fairly prominent chest tattoos, etc, wouldn't you offer that info up?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[KristiA]

I think the dispatcher asked about VISIBLE tatoos...

Thanks! I had a hard time hearing it listening on my phone.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[2Hope4]

That is a strange 911 call. Very calm. Only reporting Dad missing until asked if someone was with him.

 

[Treelights]

In the beginning, Is the son's first words "It's All Good." on the 911 recording?

 

[KristiA]

True. But if it was your relative, and you knew about fairly prominent chest tattoos, etc, wouldn't you offer that info up?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would. I would also offer up the huge scar on his hand/arm region.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[nervous_nellie]

True. But if it was your relative, and you knew about fairly prominent chest tattoos, etc, wouldn't you offer that info up?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think the fact that he understood right away that it was only visible tatoos might mean he has had some contact with LE in the past...

 

[nervous_nellie]

I would. I would also offer up the huge scar on his hand/arm region.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

oops, I forgot about that!! yeah, why didnt he mention that?

 

[Treelights]

True. But if it was your relative, and you knew about fairly prominent chest tattoos, etc, wouldn't you offer that info up?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right!!! from A to Z!!!!

 

[CatsInTheCradle]

Hopefully the couple just felt used and decided to go and live life for a little bit without broadcasting it to the household.

Btw. What is the sq ft of their home and how many occupance and whose the primary owners or renters. Tia

I would think the people they were living with might feel used rather than the other way around. JMO

 

[DexterMorgan]

I haven't looked up the house in property records, but according to the PI on the case he had 14 occupants to interview. That is definitely a full house if the couple makes 16.

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news...ility-in-couples-disappearance-abrk/29537059/

14. That's got to be a typo. So 2 out of 16 went missing. Wouldn’t you take the kids and the couple if you was looking to get money from the couple.

This is definitely a inside job. Btw. Computer searches may be hard due to all of the occupants.

 

[wannabeasupersleuth]

I haven't looked up the house in property records, but according to the PI on the case he had 14 occupants to interview. That is definitely a full house if the couple makes 16.

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news...ility-in-couples-disappearance-abrk/29537059/

16 total occupants? Did the house have a north and south wing? Communes live in groups of 16. This to me is strange. What was going on to where there were so many people living under 1 roof??

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

 

[nervous_nellie]

http://www.trulia.com/homes/Arizona/Maricopa/sold/322249-50740-W-Mayer-Blvd-Maricopa-AZ-85139

50740 W Mayer BlvdMaricopa, AZ 85139 See your commute times

• Farm/Ranch
• 2,982 sqft
• Lot size: 3.22 acres
• Built in 2001

 

[Treelights]

I see what LE meant when there would be speculation when more info was released.
Wow!

 

[KateB]

Thread #2 is ready for posting. I copied over the last 3 links for easy reference to continue the discussion.

Thread #2


This thread will be closed in 15 minutes.