Geesh, really wondering why the jury couldn't come to an unanimous verdict on #2. There has to be some type of parameters for "creating a grave risk of death" that limit the general "he had a gun, he shot the gun, was or wasn't he aiming, people and houses were around", and did they take in effect that a .357 bullet travels in excess off 1,400 feet per second, average, depending on grains? And in a residential area where you could hit a house pitching a rock?
Heck, it's illegal to discharge a weapon within a 1/4 mile of a structure while hunting, and it's certainly illegal to discharge a weapon in an incorporated city without probable cause...........because you just might hit someone.
Hope they come to a verdict on this last part and there aren't a few "dim lights" in the bunch.