madeleine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 4,972
- Reaction score
- 90
Let's say that the Ramsey's are innocent like they claim and all they wanted was to find their daughter's killer.
Now,it's obvious that if there was prior abuse then the "intruder" was the one responsible,agreed?Whether he killed her to silence her or it was another sex game gone wrong,it happened before so it's clear she KNEW her abuser.
What I will never get is..................why this reaction?(and this is ONLY one example re this topic)
2000 March 27 Larry King Live
Interview with John and Patsy Ramsey
Larry King: If it was a pedophile, was your daughter sexually abused?
Patsy Ramsey: I don't believe there is conclusive evidence of that.
John Ramsey: We don't know.
KING: Have you talked to them about -- do they send you the autopsy reports?
John Ramsey: No, no.
Patsy Ramsey: No.
John Ramsey: We've -- the police have not talked to us at all. We don't know what's been done.
Larry King: Well, they have questioned you, right?
John Ramsey: They have questioned us extensively.
Larry King: But they haven't told you anything about -- you have not seen the death certificate?
John Ramsey: No.
Patsy Ramsey: No.
Larry King: You don't know how your daughter died?
Patsy Ramsey: Well, we do.
John Ramsey: We do.
Patsy Ramsey: From what we...
John Ramsey: She was strangled.
Larry King: That's the cause of death, strangulation?
John Ramsey: That's the cause of death.
Larry King: But you don't know if any sexual activity took place?
John Ramsey: It's not clear to me that there was. We don't know. It's one of those questions you don't want to know the answer to, frankly.
Why deny prior abuse????It's key in finding out who killed JB IF IDI.Start with who was molesting her,who had access to her before her murder.
Why is JR saying he doesn't even wanna know the answer to it,he contradicts himself again though,first he says NO,she WASN'T abused before.
How does he know?Is this a normal reaction when someone tells you your daughter has been previously assaulted?Instead of oh my God,it's NO,it didn't happen?WTH?
Why to they deny this if it's KEY in finding the killer?
Why did they always ignore this topic?Why do they narrow the suspect list by doing this?
Please IDI's,enlighten me.
Now,it's obvious that if there was prior abuse then the "intruder" was the one responsible,agreed?Whether he killed her to silence her or it was another sex game gone wrong,it happened before so it's clear she KNEW her abuser.
What I will never get is..................why this reaction?(and this is ONLY one example re this topic)
2000 March 27 Larry King Live
Interview with John and Patsy Ramsey
Larry King: If it was a pedophile, was your daughter sexually abused?
Patsy Ramsey: I don't believe there is conclusive evidence of that.
John Ramsey: We don't know.
KING: Have you talked to them about -- do they send you the autopsy reports?
John Ramsey: No, no.
Patsy Ramsey: No.
John Ramsey: We've -- the police have not talked to us at all. We don't know what's been done.
Larry King: Well, they have questioned you, right?
John Ramsey: They have questioned us extensively.
Larry King: But they haven't told you anything about -- you have not seen the death certificate?
John Ramsey: No.
Patsy Ramsey: No.
Larry King: You don't know how your daughter died?
Patsy Ramsey: Well, we do.
John Ramsey: We do.
Patsy Ramsey: From what we...
John Ramsey: She was strangled.
Larry King: That's the cause of death, strangulation?
John Ramsey: That's the cause of death.
Larry King: But you don't know if any sexual activity took place?
John Ramsey: It's not clear to me that there was. We don't know. It's one of those questions you don't want to know the answer to, frankly.
Why deny prior abuse????It's key in finding out who killed JB IF IDI.Start with who was molesting her,who had access to her before her murder.
Why is JR saying he doesn't even wanna know the answer to it,he contradicts himself again though,first he says NO,she WASN'T abused before.
How does he know?Is this a normal reaction when someone tells you your daughter has been previously assaulted?Instead of oh my God,it's NO,it didn't happen?WTH?
Why to they deny this if it's KEY in finding the killer?
Why did they always ignore this topic?Why do they narrow the suspect list by doing this?
Please IDI's,enlighten me.