Ole Cosby made his 71 year old wife another victim. Jmo. Now Camille told Cosby early on that if he does cheat for whatever reason. Then she doesn't want to hear about it. But now at the age of 71. She is forced to testify in criminal and civil suits about whatever. Now of course I blame hubby. But I also blame the legal system for forcing a 70 year old wife to testify in anything that she never agreed to. Jmo. At a certain age. Most people are vulnerable in thinking due to many possibilities. So if she has shown any signs of dementia. Then her testimony shouldn't count. Jmo. Btw. They could have made Camille testify decades ago. So why wait until she is 70 years old. Now I do blame hubby. But I truly think that they should stop putting the old wife on the stand unless she was a co conspirator. Jmo
CC is not being "put on the stand" when she is deposed. Spousal privilege in Massachusetts applies to criminal trials, not the investigative procedure being pursued by AIG Property Casualty. CC may choose to invoke the First Amendment if she is in danger of facing any criminal charges. While CC may not have to testify regarding her husband's behaviour, AIG may be able to use information gained from her deposition as part of its case against having to cover particular costs arising from BC's sexual actions with JD. This is all about the money AIG does not want to be in any danger of paying out. IMO, AIG wants BC to be forced to pay JD himself, should the need arise.
I find it troubling that you seem to think CC is past her best buy date for memory and honesty because she has celebrated her 70th birthday. Does CC's long and intimate relationship with BC and all his various agents, directors, and other associates now count for nothing in your opinion just because the first number in her age is now "7" and not "6"?
Does her long-held position as BC's business manager (
http://www.thewrap.com/why-bill-cosbys-wife-camille-was-ordered-to-testify-against-him/) no longer have validity because she is now in her seventh decade of life? Are you making the "it's all in the past so it doesn't matter now" argument, or just a "she's old and shouldn't be embarrassed by discussions of her husband's exploits" argument? And, as regards to your phrase "the old wife", does BC have a new one?
Dementia is not necessarily a part of every person's life once they reach "a certain age". Forgetfulness is a normal, if annoying, part of life for people at any age--for instance, I think many people have claimed to be unable to remember certain details because sleep deprivation and constant interruptions have given them "baby brain". IMO, a lot of people have personal calendars or agendas, diaries or journals for just that reason--as a reminder of coming appointments, past incidents, potential conflicts of engagements, and so on. It's one way of establishing some order in a person's life and a way of confirming when certain events happened, should the need arise to establish a firm date.
Dementia is something else again. For anyone who worries that they may have Alzheimer's because they have forgotten something, the Alzheimer's Association has a helpful list of 10 Early Signs and Symptoms of Alzheimer's online which provides a contrast between something which is a normal part of aging, and something which could be indicative of Alzehimer's or another form of dementia. The internet, obviously, does not replace expert medical advice. (
http://www.alz.org/alzheimers_disease_10_signs_of_alzheimers.asp)