"Due process is not a technicality". Quote from Bill Cosby. He is an idiot.
They violated his fifth amendment right. That is not a "technicality".
"Due process is not a technicality". Quote from Bill Cosby. He is an idiot.
They violated his fifth amendment right. That is not a "technicality".
Everyone is entitled to due process. Everyone accused with any crime from shoplifting to mass murder, and everything in between."Due process is not a technicality". Quote from Bill Cosby. He is an idiot.
I wonder how many of us can buy enough lawyer to arrange for a court to acknowledge and act upon an unwritten agreement with a former DA.
Rather, how few of us.
![]()
image from foundrybaltimore.com
jmho ymmv lrr
The former prosecutor testified to this agreement.
Agreement not to prosecute Bill Cosby leads to his freedom, exposes prosecution's missteps
“Bruce Castor Jr., the former district attorney of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, has testified that he made the arrangement not to charge Cosby but to still get him to make sworn statements in the civil case because there was insufficient evidence at the time to bring forth a criminal prosecution….
……Legal experts say the latest turn of events will only lead some to lay the blame at prosecutors' feet: either on Castor — for cutting an arrangement with Cosby that he wouldn't be charged, an agreement that was never put in writing — or against his successors who used Cosby's past testimony against him and, whether they realized it or not, would violate his due process rights….”
Everyone is entitled to due process. Everyone accused with any crime from shoplifting to mass murder, and everything in between.
But, it is not a "technicality". Due process is a right, same as appeals. Bill Cosby was convicted on evidence. The fact that his own testimony was used against him, is a fifth amendment issue.
The crux of the matter here, is that there was some sort of shady back alley deal? I don't know how BC is getting out, based on a "handshake deal" that was never actually written out. There is something really sketch about that.
I agree, I can’t make sense of it. He admits wrongdoing-his own testimony but because of deal that was made he goes free??
ETA-if this is a way to get out of prison what prevents further deals like this being made in the future? Seems like an open door going forward…
I totally agree, and I know which DA I blame for this fiasco, and it isn't the 2nd one!But, it is not a "technicality". Due process is a right, same as appeals. Bill Cosby was convicted on evidence. The fact that his own testimony was used against him, is a fifth amendment issue.
The crux of the matter here, is that there was some sort of shady back alley deal? I don't know how BC is getting out, based on a "handshake deal" that was never actually written out. There is something really sketch about that.
Not nearly long enough!!! His victims got sentenced to a lifetime of trauma.He served three years, which is more than some thought he would.
Too bad his victims didn't get that.Everyone is entitled to due process. Everyone accused with any crime from shoplifting to mass murder, and everything in between.
The Faria case has nothing to do with Cosby. Yes Faria was wrongfully convicted because Pam Hupp pulled a fast one and they couldn't believe that a woman did it. I did follow that case on more than one crime show.Lol, WebSleuths deleted one of my posts in this thread because it "misstated the purpose and philosophy" of the forum, or something.
Anyone getting mad about the Cosby case should take a look at THIS case: GUILTY - MO - Louis Gumpenerger, 33, disabled, murdered, OFallon, 16 Aug 2016 and spend a minute or two thinking about how much power we put in the hands of prosecutors.
By the way, that linked thread is only one small part of a much bigger and more elaborate plot that stretches 10 years and involves the murders of potentially 3 people. There's no dedicated Betsy Faria thread on Websleuths, but I highly encourage everyone to read about Pam Hupp, Betsy Faria, Russ Faria, etc., online. It's scary to think just how much power the police and prosecutors have. They went after an innocent man for no other reason than that he "fit" the part of the killer, in their eyes. He was a big, ugly, rough dude, so he should have been the bad guy, as far as they were concerned. And because of their refusal to investigate the case fairly, not only did one man have to live a nightmare for years, but one and possibly two other people ended up dying at the hands of the (most likely) real killer.
Personally, I'd like to see the sort of outrage that's directed at Cosby re-directed towards police and prosecutors who secure wrongful convictions on innocent people.