Huh? We cannot discount facts that are presented before us, in this case. Theres no right or wrong in it. Hearsay, such as what we saw on GR the other night is something we can rightly or wrongly discount, based on what facts we have on hand. This document is a Court Filed Document and if it was filed with the court, there is a follow-up. I see your point, that it's irrellavent to you, because he Maintained custody. To minimize or dismiss allegations as serious as these were regarding the children is not in what is in the best interest of the children.
My point: If allegations were brought forward and not looked into carefully, they may have missed something ... and that is unfortunate for the overall wellbeing of children in the court system.
Later when I return from my shopping_ I am going to compile something in RC thread, regarding a distinctive omission ( I call it a lie) and the judge made the order without looking into something that was brought up at the time of the testifying by mr cummings. Fact or fiction? Fact based on his own testimony. Crystal didnt stand a chance in that hearing. She at the time, didnt appear to have her ducks in a row. imo