Bio Mom & her family

[samsmom02]

That is exactly what I posted on Ron's thread yesterday.
Haleigh turns up missing and the court put a hold on the contempt hearing. Yes, CS still owes back support but until that hearing happens she is off the hook and doesn't end up in jail.

That is exactly what did end up happening. Court put a hold on the hearing. [Would love to know if the court did it or this was a court action based on an action by CS or Ron]

Now my other question was/is. Can CS now use the fact that Haleigh is missing on Ron's watch to regain custody of Jr. That would then terminate all support payments going into the future.
Also, if Ron ends up in jail, even not having anything to do with Haleigh being missing but on a statutory charge because of Misty's age, would he be owed that back support?

The fact that we know the child services has been to the home in the last 5 months since they moved into the 202 Green Lane home, for what is what we don’t know. School absences, abuse allegation, Misty's age. Could be anyone of them and the complaint could have come from CS, her mother, the school, a neighbor or an anonymous person. That leads me believe that child services did not find anything amiss in the home since the children were still there. It also lead me to believe that there must be something, emancipation papers for Misty or consent papers for Misty to keep child services from removing Misty from the home as well.

CS according to the documents that we can see has not been able to prove her allegations and Ron has retained custody of the children. It has been said many times by other posters but CS has not done the things that need to be done to in the eyes of the court to get custody. The court does not keep it a secrete what one needs to do for custody and she had an attorney to boot. CS also has been shown to make a false report to LE. That in it self goes along way to credibility in any future court proceedings. Not paying her court ordered support and allowing the arrears to grow to that amount that is puts her one step from being arrested shows again that she is not willing to do what is necessary and also shows what little regard she does have for her children. Paying support in not punishment for not being able to live with the father it is for the benefit of your children’s well being.

I am not saying that Crystal had anything to do with taking Haleigh but that does not mean that someone connected to her did not. Who benefits the most from Haleigh being missing?

As far as the question if it was the mother who was responsible why not take JR at the same time. Thinking about it logically if you heard that both children were taken what or who would be you first thought. The non-custodial parent. And LE would think the same thing also and immediately go full bore at the CS and comp

:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:

 

[kiki the parrot]

I'm really lovin Law Girl- but Kiki, you are just as reasonable. Thanks to both of you for not blaming the victim like others are inclined to do here.

Thanks pirate. I guess LG and I have something in common, she's not the only one here who is passionate about Domestic Violence or has been an advocate for victims. Having survived it, became involved in ARMS (Abuse Recovery Ministry Services) and I too have learned to recognize the warning signs and red flags... JMO

arrot:

 

[pirate]

Kiki, honestly I don't want to fight.. Truly. But here's my question. The court battle went on for years, yet never once did the court waiver from their original decision even with the bio father's serious allegations. It just doesn't make "sense" to me. So what makes you think that those allegations were true in light of the court never reversing the decision??

The court battle did not go on for years. It was done before Jr was a year old.

 

[pirate]

Thanks pirate. I guess LG and I have something in common, she's not the only one here who is passionate about Domestic Violence or has been an advocate for victims. Having survived it, became involved in ARMS (Abuse Recovery Ministry Services) and I too have learned to recognize the warning signs and red flags... JMO

arrot:

I'm a survivor too. And when I look at pictures of myself from that time in my life I see the same flat, defeated look that Crystal carries.

 

[jaimie43]

Not only did she call her kids "brats" she had more pictures of her new
baby and of her car accident than she had of the "brats"
I"m talking .... maybe 10 pictures of the "brats" and 40 of the car accident!

I cant give any merit to this at all...I have more pics of my dogs than I do my kids on my myspace and the only picture I carry in my car is of my fav dog. DOES NOT mean I love my dog(s) more than my kids...

 

[CeeKer]

The court battle did not go on for years. It was done before Jr was a year old.

It went on from 9/16/05 till 8/11/07. Custody was determined in 2005, but that was not the end of it.

UCN: 542005DR001321FDXXXX
File Date: 2005-09-16
Disposition Date: 2007-11-08
File Type: PATERNITY - FD12
Judge: A W NICHOLS III

Plaintiffs
CUMMINGS RONALD LEMYLES
Defendants
SHEFFIELD CRYSTAL DIANE

2005-09-16
001.PETITION TO DETERMINE PATERNITY AND RELATED RELIEF

2005-09-16
002.IDENTIFICATION - DRIVER'S LICENSE

2005-09-16
003.UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION/ENFORCEMENT AFFID.

2005-09-16
004.FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT - PETITIONER

2005-09-16
005.NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY - PETITIONER

2005-09-16
006.REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED

2005-09-16
007. SUMMONS ISSUED:CRYSTAL DIANE SHEFFIELD 9/19/2005

2005-09-16
.ADDRESS:11024 ARROWBROOK JAX FL 32221

2005-09-16
.SUMM RT 10-26-05 SVD 10-05-05 DUE 10-25-05

2005-10-18
012. ANSWER FILED BY PETITIONER

2005-10-18
012. ANSWER FILED BY RESPONDENT

2005-10-26
008. MOTION TO SET HEARING

2005-10-26
009. MOTION FOR DEFAULT

2005-10-27
010. DEFAULT ENTERED

2005-10-27
011.CLERK'S CERTIFICATE

2005-11-01
013. EMERGENCY VERIFED MOTION FOR CHILD PICK-UP ORDER

2005-11-01
014.UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY JURISDICTION/ENFORCEMENT AFFID.

2005-11-01
015. ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT - EEH

2005-11-01
016.ORDER OF REFERRAL TO GENERAL MAGISTRATE - EEH

2005-11-01
.PETITION TO DETERMINE PATERNITY AND FOR RELATED RELIEF

2005-11-01
.FILED BY PETITIONER

2005-11-22
017. COPY - NOTICE OF HEARING - 12-01-05 @ 9:00 RMP

2005-11-22
.PETITIONERS MOTION TO DETERMINE PATERNITY

2005-12-01
018. FAMILY COURT MIN - PET. PRES, RESP. NOT PRES,

2005-12-01
.C/S TO BE DETERMINED, SHARED PRIMARY RESIDENTAL WITH

2005-12-01
.FATHER,. STANDARD AT FATHER DISCREATION, JUDICALLY

2005-12-01
.RECOGNIZED 05-1354 -FD, RONALD CUMMINGS DECLARED LEGAL

2005-12-01
.FATHER OF BOTH CHILDREN , SHARED PARENTAL RESPONSLIBILTY

2005-12-01
.WITH PRIMARY RESIDENTAL WITH FATHER, STANDARD

2005-12-01
.VISITATION DISCRESTION OF FATHER IF SAFETY FOR THE

2005-12-01
.CHILDREN CONCERNS ADVISE, 24 HRS NOTICE TO EXCERSISE

2005-12-01
.VISITATION , MOTHER NOT TO REMOVE CHILDREN FROM THE

2005-12-01
.STATE OF FLORIDA WITHOUT FATHERS WRITTN CONSENT OR

2005-12-01
.FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT

2005-12-05
021.REPORT/RECOMMENDATION OF GENERAL MASTER-MP

2005-12-05
.PET. FOUND TO BE FATHER OF MINOR CHILDREN, SHARED

2005-12-05
.PARENTAL RESPONSLIBLITY, WITH PETITIONER HAVING

2005-12-05
.PRIMARY RESIDENTAL CUSTODY, UNSUPERVISED VISITATION

2005-12-05
.ACCORDING TO STANDARD VISITATION SCHEDULE, MOTHER TO

2005-12-05
.PAY C/S OF $323/MTH TO BEGININING WHEN ORDER SIGNED

2005-12-05
.BOTH PARTIES TO MAINTAIN MEDICAID INSURANCE ON BOTH

2005-12-05
.CHILDREN

2005-12-05
019. NOTICE OF CURRENT ADDRESS - CRYSTAL SHEFFIELD

2005-12-05
020.IDENTIFICATION - DRIVER'S LICENSE - RESPONDENT

2005-12-06
022. FAXED LETTER FROM RESPONDENT TO MAGISTRATE IN RE:

2005-12-06
.REHEARING

2005-12-08
023. RETURN TO SENDER - REPORT AND RECOMMEDATION - RESP.

2005-12-13
024. NOTICE OF HEARING - 12-27-05 @ 10:30 RMP - PETITIONERS

2005-12-13
.MOTION TO DETERMINE PATERNITY AND RELATED RELIEF

2005-12-13
025. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR REHEARING - RMP -

2005-12-27
026.CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION OF PARENTING CLASS

2005-12-27
RESPONDENT

2005-12-27
027.FAMILY COURT MINUTES

2006-01-03
028.REPORT/RECOMMENDATION OF GENERAL MASTER-MP

2006-01-06
029. MOTION FOR REHEARING AND OBJECTION TO FINDINGS

2006-01-06
OF MAGISTRATE

2006-01-20
030.MOTION TO STRIKE OR DIMISS MOTION FOR REHEARING

2006-01-20
AND OBJECTION TO FINDINGS OF MAGISTRATE-PETITIONER

2006-01-24
031.NOTICE OF HEARING-HRG SET FOR 02/28/06 @ 1:30

2006-01-24
EEH-COURTROOM 305

2006-01-25
032.NOTICE OF HEARING-HRG SET FOR 02/28/06 @ 1:30-EEH

2006-01-31
033.CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION-HUSBAND

2006-02-28
034.FAMILY COURT MINUTES

2006-03-02
035.NOTICE OF HEARING-SET FOR 04/06/06 @ 3:00

2006-03-09
036.EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RETURN OF CHILDREN - PETITIONER

2006-03-15
037.NOTICE OF HEARING - HRG SET FOR 03/21/06 @ 10:30

2006-03-16
038.SUBPOENA FOR HEARING - HRG SET FOR 03/21/06 @ 10:30

2006-03-16
SUBPOENA FOR: MICHAEL S WORD C/O WALMART DISTRIBUTION

2006-03-16
CENTER

2006-03-20
039.NOTICE OF FILING TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR

2006-03-20
PROTECTION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WITH MINOR

2006-03-20
CHILDREN

2006-03-21
040.FAMILY COURT MINUTES

2006-03-22
041.ORDER ON EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RETURN OF CHILDREN

2006-03-22
042.NOTICE OF FILING TEMPORARY INJUNCTION FOR

2006-03-22
PROTECTION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WITH MINOR

2006-03-22
CHILDREN

2006-04-04
043.NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING

2006-04-12
044.NOTICE OF UN-AVAILABILITY-CHARLES BEHM-ESQUIRE

2006-08-17
045.NOTICE OF HEARING - STATUS CONFERENCE

2006-08-17
HRG SET FOR 10/04/06 @ 3:00 - EEH

2006-10-04
046.FAMILY COURT MINUTES-PET NOT PRESENT-R MURPHY PRESENT

2006-10-04
RESP NOT PRESENT-C BEHM PRESENT

2006-12-28
047.NOTICE OF HEARING - HRG SET FOR 01/04/017 @ 3:30

2007-01-04
048.NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT - RESPONDENT

2007-01-26
049.NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS

2007-01-26
OF MAGISTRATE-HRG SET FOR 02/13/07 @ 2:00 - EEH

2007-02-13
050.FAMILY COURT MINUTES PET PR RESP PR

2007-02-22
051.NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY OF COUNSEL - BEHM

2007-05-11
052.CORRESPONDENCE FROM NANCY GRIFFIS TO EEH

2007-11-08
053.ORDER APPROVING REPORT/RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE

2007-11-26
FL#200754636011

2008-06-16
054.DOR INTERCEPT IN THE AMOUNT OF $48.00 ON 06/16/08

2009-02-10
055.MOTION FOR CONTEMPT 03-27-09 AT 08:30

 

[pirate]

I cant give any merit to this at all...I have more pics of my dogs than I do my kids on my myspace and the only picture I carry in my car is of my fav dog. DOES NOT mean I love my dog(s) more than my kids...

Exactly.

And I call my child a brat on a regular basis.............. it's a term of endearment.

 

[jaimie43]

Exactly.

And I call my child a brat on a regular basis.............. it's a term of endearment.

LOL! And "heathen" means "I love you dearly" here too!

 

[Tom'sGirl]

I'm closing this thread and starting a new one here for discussion of Crystal Sheffield only.

Including family members that may be of interest can be discussed on their own thread, if they aren't already. Discussing several 'players' on one thread becomes confusing.