Book released by Defense Atty Nov 2015 #1

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
It is sort of hard to follow (surprise! It's Nurmi). He talks about JA saying (at trial) that she was molested when she was a child by a slightly older family member. He says that he isn't sure JA is telling the truth but that kids who molest were usually molested themselves. Therefore if a JA family member was molested as a child (most likely by another family member) it stands to reason that JA could have been molested similarly. But that there is no evidence she was molested.

Just about every undesirable trait she has he seems to be saying "that reminds me of someone who was abused as a child."

BBM. Well, well, well.... Nurmi is saying Jodi is a molester? And therefore she's likely to have been molested? Nurmi's book is sounding more interesting at this point...
 
I have a question that has been puzzling to me. I know its off topic but my curiosity dictates that I ask . Did Bobby Juarez ( Jodi's ex bf) die ? and if so was he murdered ? I found an article about a Bobby Juarez that died some time between 2007- 2008. He was killed by an unknown person .This person had a very young son . Does anyone know and can you give details .

I think that was hashed out here a while ago. No, different BJ. Jodi's ex got away safely. :clap:
 
The book makes is quite obvious that KN truly believes TA is a pedophile. He compares TA on the sex tape to Jared "Foggle" (I presume he means Jared Fogle.)

The writing is very circular, and the arguments are awful. My 10 year old shows far superior logic and reasoning skills than KN. He talks about how he believes the pedo letters were forged, but TA is still a pedophile because the state could not prove with 100 percent certainty that they were forged. I have to read sections several times to make sure it isn't me, LOL.

He spelled Deanna Reid's name as "Deana" (which I think is incorrect). He twice writes "by in large" when he means "by and large." His wife edited the work, according to KN. She should not quit her day job.

Along the same lines, truly petty but irksome to me, many people on the "Super Duper..." refer to Arias as the preshus angle. I don't take offense to the misspelling of "precious," since I know that's intentional, but I do to the misspelling of the word "angel." Angles are something else altogether...
 
I have a question that has been puzzling to me. I know its off topic but my curiosity dictates that I ask . Did Bobby Juarez ( Jodi's ex bf) die ? and if so was he murdered ? I found an article about a Bobby Juarez that died some time between 2007- 2008. He was killed by an unknown person .This person had a very young son . Does anyone know and can you give details .
No. Old news. BJ is, apparently, alive and well in Hawaii.
 
I agree. I truly believe if JM could have used JA's phone calls, he would have. KN sort of admits this in a later chapter when he says part of the reason he didn't call Sandy about JA's bruising (other than the fact that she was lying) was because it would have opened the door to Juan bringing in the phone calls.

More circular nonsense from KN. There are also 4 pages on why he is glad a knife and gun were never found. He acts like he is a legal genius for coming up with this.


Why was he glad they weren't found?


eta...did he suggest he knew she stole the gun from grandpa? Is that why?
 
Kids who molest? So who did she molest? Or in Nurmi -reality she was molested but didn't molest because......


A slightly older family member would be easy to figure out wouldn't it? And were they holding their breath during the super secret testimony, never knowing what Jodi would do or say.
 
I have a question that has been puzzling to me. I know its off topic but my curiosity dictates that I ask . Did Bobby Juarez ( Jodi's ex bf) die ? and if so was he murdered ? I found an article about a Bobby Juarez that died some time between 2007- 2008. He was killed by an unknown person .This person had a very young son . Does anyone know and can you give details .
The simple answer is, Bobby Juarez from Montague, CA. is not the same person as Robert Juarez from San Diego, CA.

Eta: Oops! Asked and answered. Sorry.

I will add that the conspiracy theorists out there REALLY wanted the two Bobbys to be the same man to add to the overall mystery of her roadtrip, and/or her cover-up.
 
BBM. Well, well, well.... Nurmi is saying Jodi is a molester? And therefore she's likely to have been molested? Nurmi's book is sounding more interesting at this point...

I didn't take it that way. Sorry if I was unclear. I think he was saying the young relative who maybe did/maybe didn't molest JA was most likely molested himself. He further surmised that most children are molested by family members. He was saying that if this kid was molested there is probably a molester in the family who "may" have molested JA. It is very convoluted. Sorry. On the one hand KN says she was molested by a relative and then he says he has no proof she was molested but that to his trained eye she acts like a victim of childhood sexual abuse.

And trust me, this book is far from interesting. It stinks. LOL.
 
Please re-read what I wrote. Nothing I said contradicts your thesis (nor your essay!) and I'm in full agreement. There's nothing wrong with feminism per se, it makes legitimate claims to equality where it is lacking yet can and should be applied.

I even pointed out the logical fallacy you cite in a much earlier post, that ALV and Fonseca's brand of radical feminism wants it both ways, always viewing women as victims and claiming a mock equality, but with no corresponding responsibility.

Sooooorrrry! Point well taken! My goof!

On the other point, but not in defense of my indefensible reading, I don't remember discussing ALV's and Fonseca's radical feminism before, but I have noticed, since our discussion has become fast-paced, that thoughts are echoed later by other posters as though they are novel points of view. The idea that the "advance glimpse" of Nurmi's book are a parody was claimed by several posters. So I can see that my handle might have become attached to a diatribe against radical feminism and ALV/Fonseca, especially since I detest all three.

Apologies again: I appreciate your perspectives.
 
I have a question that has been puzzling to me. I know its off topic but my curiosity dictates that I ask . Did Bobby Juarez ( Jodi's ex bf) die ? and if so was he murdered ? I found an article about a Bobby Juarez that died some time between 2007- 2008. He was killed by an unknown person .This person had a very young son . Does anyone know and can you give details .

Bobby Juarez is alive and well, last living in Hawaii. He's a bit actor in movies and things. He's still a weird looking guy.


Google Bobby Juarez
 
Summarizing some snippets.....he thinks if JM brought in the pedo letters the killer would he on death row because JM would have shredded her and revealed them as forgeries, but he also believes Travis was a pedophile.

He thought she deserved the DP -however brief the belief was-- and was sickened-- when he heard her on calls scamming folks, but...not when she lied about the man she tried to decapitate being physically abusive,etc.


Ooo....k.
 
I just saw the clip above of JM's best vignettes with ALV. I know it's been said before, but she keeps looking for answers/cues from the defense table. What if she's taking her clues from Jodi and not the attorneys? She's trying to speak from Jodi's head, like reading her mind. I tell you, ALV mixes herself up with Jodi: JM hints at this too. This is not empathy or fellow-feeling. It's lack of boundaries: merging.
 
What total and utter BS. I've read every single text of his from Dec 07 thru March 08. There isn't a single text indicating he hooked up with anyone than the killer who chased after him relentlessly for everything he had, including his body.

She had lived with 3 different boy-men before she set out hunting Mormon prey and sunk her crooked teeth into Travis. As soon as she realized at long fricking last he wasn't going to marry her she promptly went out hunting big Mormon game again and began reeling in Ryan Burns.

Blaming the victim, trashing Travis Alexander AGAIN (!!!!!!!!!) tells me all I need to know about that . They deserved one another.

Well, I am in February 2008 and I read something a little different.

I agree with your overall point that Travis doesn't appear, so far, through texts to be overly sexed. What I saw was some girl named Marie trying to get him to do "something" and I don't know what, over christmas break. He never made it to see her. She was quite unhappy about it but joked it off.

Then, Jodi was asking to give massages, take baths and "nice bj" comment in January. She also starts contacting him more and more and expressing being horny. She's gross. Anyways, He gets to talking to this one girl in February after his friend, Taylor, texts something about him being single again. This girl had kids and an ex-boyfriend or husband. Anyways, she was pretty damn graphic. she led the conversation via text, and he just followed along like any man might when a woman starts sexy talk. He didnt say anything that sounded graphic--in my opinion--but it was apparent that they were trying to hook up for oral sex. I'm on Valentine's day, and up to that point, it seemed like the girl kept canceling and she sort of fell off the text stream--so far. So he may have never gone anywhere with that.
 
Why was he glad they weren't found?

Sorry to not include that, LOL. Because finding them would have been worse for her. For example, if they were found they would have her fingerprints on them. If they found a knife that came from somewhere other than TA's house, that could go towards proving premeditation (she brought it with her). If they found the gun, her grandfather could positively ID it rather than the state having to just say it was the same type of gun. The less evidence that implicates your client, the better.

I think he is nervous that Juan is going to make him look like a buffoon. I'm sensing a lot of "I am a great attorney and you people just don't understand my ways" as I get further into the book (I'm about half way done).
 
I just saw the clip above of JM's best vignettes with ALV. I know it's been said before, but she keeps looking for answers/cues from the defense table. What if she's taking her clues from Jodi and not the attorneys? I tell you, ALV mixes herself up with Jodi: JM hints at this too. This is not empathy or fellow-feeling. It's lack of boundaries: merging.
One of the best moments of the trial was when Juan's questions had her on the ropes and, frustrated with her delays in answering them, he finally says to her, "you keep looking left (over towards the defense table). I'm over here!" :)
 
Along the same lines, truly petty but irksome to me, many people on the "Super Duper..." refer to Arias as the preshus angle. I don't take offense to the misspelling of "precious," since I know that's intentional, but I do to the misspelling of the word "angel." Angles are something else altogether...


I believe their "intentional" misspelling of "angle" is mocking some of the support sites grammar, they do so quite often. :laughing:
 
page 129: "in my opinion, these men [Detectives Flores and Melendez] simply wanted to serve whatever agenda Juan Martinez had at that moment."

And Doctor Horn thought people should believe him just because he was handsome. (pg. 130)

Jealous much?
 
What does that even mean? "By in large?" It reminds me of the phrase "Before too long."

As long as we're on the topic (since this bothers me as well) ... would of, could of, etc., as opposed to would have or could have (or would've or could've). I know the words sound the same, but...
 
Well, I am in February 2008 and I read something a little different.

I agree with your overall point that Travis doesn't appear, so far, through texts to be overly sexed. What I saw was some girl named Marie trying to get him to do "something" and I don't know what, over christmas break. He never made it to see her. She was quite unhappy about it but joked it off.

Then, Jodi was asking to give massages, take baths and "nice bj" comment in January. She also starts contacting him more and more and expressing being horny. She's gross. Anyways, He gets to talking to this one girl in February after his friend, Taylor, texts something about him being single again. This girl had kids and an ex-boyfriend or husband. Anyways, she was pretty damn graphic. she led the conversation via text, and he just followed along like any man might when a woman starts sexy talk. He didnt say anything that sounded graphic--in my opinion--but it was apparent that they were trying to hook up for oral sex. I'm on Valentine's day, and up to that point, it seemed like the girl kept canceling and she sort of fell off the text stream--so far. So he may have never gone anywhere with that.


He never got together with her. And so fricking what if he did??? He wasn't even in any relationship by Feb. 08..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
230
Guests online
279
Total visitors
509

Forum statistics

Threads
608,542
Messages
18,240,862
Members
234,392
Latest member
FamilyGal
Back
Top