RickshawFan
Verified Outdoor Recreation Specialist
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2013
- Messages
- 11,156
- Reaction score
- 55,466
It is sort of hard to follow (surprise! It's Nurmi). He talks about JA saying (at trial) that she was molested when she was a child by a slightly older family member. He says that he isn't sure JA is telling the truth but that kids who molest were usually molested themselves. Therefore if a JA family member was molested as a child (most likely by another family member) it stands to reason that JA could have been molested similarly. But that there is no evidence she was molested.
Just about every undesirable trait she has he seems to be saying "that reminds me of someone who was abused as a child."
BBM. Well, well, well.... Nurmi is saying Jodi is a molester? And therefore she's likely to have been molested? Nurmi's book is sounding more interesting at this point...