Edmond.DantesIII
Inactive
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 150
- Reaction score
- 0
I don't think so. AH was not and is not an expert on the JonBenet Ramsey case. The grand jurors, on the other hand, spent over a year of their lives poring through the evidence, (and not even all of it), so it's safe to say, they were knowledgeable on the subject of JonBenet's murder. To say the weight of the evidence leans toward the Rs being not guilty, is a misinformed statement. The grand jury sure didn't think so. That's why they voted to indict both of the Rs for child abuse resulting in death. This isn't gossip, this isn't speculation, and regardless of what JR says, this isn't 'just drama'. This is fact. No amount of wild theories, spin, or anger will change it. Accepting this news may be hard for some, but it is what it is. A GRAND JURY, (one of the most serious and awe inspiring duties in the US), voted to indict the Rs.
You seem to be confused as to what an indictment actually means. An indictment simply means that there is enough evidence to take the case to trial. It is not a judgment of conviction. However, the weight of the evidence, in my opinion, and surely in the opinion of the Ramsey defense team, would almost certainly have resulted in a verdict of Not Guilty. This is exactly why AH did not take the case to trial. He would have lost, and lost badly.