PagingDrDetect
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2006
- Messages
- 310
- Reaction score
- 6
If a judge did in fact rule the entire autopsy report had to be disclosed publically, those details would also have been known by the defense (the Ramsey's and their attorneys) as well as anyone else who wanted to look at it. The medical examiner can't leave out information from the autopsy report on purpose as any information about the condition of the body not revealed in the autopsy report would be deemed in court to be inadmissable for the prosecution to use... it's bad enough when a medical examiner leaves out pertinant information from their report by mistake - to do it on purpose would be obstruction of justice.Originally Posted by Twinkle
Those details were known only to the medical examiner and the investigators probing the December 26, 1996 murder of the six-year-old beauty queen, the law enforcement official said.
However, some of that information from the autopsy report may still be sealed... but that's only if a judge never ruled that the entire thing had to be made public.
Additionally, one of the mods here mentioned in another thread here that they've gotten tons of calls from LE asking that certain information not be revealed as fact here as it was never publically released... what does that tell ya? All that LE can claim about the meaning of "information not publically released" would be information THEY never publically released.
Incidently, I just walked by the TV which I have tuned to ABC, and I happened to catch the announcer saying that Karr knew grusome details about the condition of the body that wasn't "widely known"... not information "not publically released". Interesting.
If Fuhrman himself isn't part of this investigation, he has no idea whether or not the Ramsey attorneys were given all the evidence. Considering the fact that none of the Ramseys were officially cleared as suspects, there's no possible way they would have been given all the information. All the information in any investigation is never revealed (and rightly so) until the discovery phase of a trial.Originally Posted by Blondieskatz
Mark Furhman pointed out the other night on Nancy Grace that the Ramsey attorneys had been given all the evidence.
Frankly, seeing as Fuhrman was convicted of perjury in the OJ trial, I would take anything he said with a large boulder of salt.
Ok, you owe me a new keyboard now since you just made me spew iced tea all over mine with that remark! *giggle, snort*Originally Posted by Blondieskatz
:laugh: Go find your Xmas photos from 1996. Especially if they involve someone who you have divorced and regard to be something less than a toad. I'll wait.