singularity
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2015
- Messages
- 727
- Reaction score
- 49
You leapfrog between scenarios continuously. You say it cant be PDI cause its BDI but all the evidence indicated PDI so that means its BDI! In the next breath, there's nothing to indicate PDI so its BDI but maybe its JDI if its not BDI.I never ever said Patsy did everything.
BDI is morphing into "Who's on first?".
The main problem with that scenario is there's literally no evidence that Burke killed her. What little evidence there is linking anyone to actual murder leads us straight to Patsy(her fibers in the garrote, on the tape). The few fibers that exist as far as a potential sexual assault goes don't lead to Burke either....they lead to John.Patsy and John in BDI All, are mere crime-scene stagers. They do not kill JonBenet, Burke did that, they just relocate JonBenet from upstairs to the basement, clean her up, wrap her in the blanket and put her in the wine-cellar, then author a ransom note, hoping it explains why JonBenet went from her bedroom to the wine-cellar, e.g. nasty intruder.
This is why you now place them in the category of "mere crime scene stagers". Its an attempt to dance around the fact there's no evidence to indicate your suspect is a murderer. This is also why BDI wants to ignore the majority of info in this case now. It needs the spotlight on Burke and doesn't want people to see anything else.....hence the never ending focus on longjohns, pineapple, and size 12s....which may be of minor relevance to actual murder yet have to be the main topic of discussion.