Curiousobserver
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2018
- Messages
- 2,633
- Reaction score
- 29,138
I am not sure that means much. If I walked from my car to my office and back there would also be no evidence from me located in the parking lot. It doesn't prove I wasn't there, it just proves I didn't leave evidence there. If I drove away (assuming no cameras) there would be no evidence I was even in town that day.I have been kind of wondering - when they say there's no evidence of Barbara located in the desert, does that mean NONE whatsoever? Were there footprints or things in the trailer that she had been there but there's no evidence elsewhere in the desert? Or did they mean no evidence ANYWHERE? That would certainly call into question if she was ever really there. Sorry for the weirdly worded question, PM
JMO
I think LE was hoping to find a piece of her clothing, her hat, or the beer can/mug she was carrying. They are surprised because they didn't find any of those things (as am I). Its possible that all of those things are intact and stayed with her while she fell or crawled into some crevice they didn't or couldn't search but it seems so improbable to me.
I expect they are scouring any and all electronics that her husband could provide to find evidence that she was in that (or some other) location that day. They have asked him hundreds of questions like where he stopped to eat, shop, get gas, pee, etc.. and will see if there is any video, credit cards receipts, and if anybody remembers them at those places. My guess is that the resources have shifted to a traditional investigation of the SO as the prime suspect.
<modsnip: not victim friendly>
Last edited by a moderator: