Angelo
There will be justice for Mr. Harrod
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2009
- Messages
- 1,412
- Reaction score
- 1,528
I'd like to know what was bought at Home Depot.
I don't know what was bought at Home Depot but the SIL bought soda and paper plates at CVS.
I'd like to know what was bought at Home Depot.
From what I read in the OC Register news article,
anyone that was a possible suspect in anyone's mind,
has been cleared.
The sheriff seems to think they have some more leads and
I hope so.
PPD must have some more tips, or clues, or something the public just is not aware of....
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/harrod-bob-police-2598739-fontelle-michaels
snipped from this article:
''There are no suspects, Loomis said. There's not even any evidence of a crime.''
''But Jeff Michaels' story checks out, and neither he nor any of the daughters are suspects in the disappearance, Loomis said.''
''Fontelle Harrod and her children by previous marriages wouldn't have anything to gain
by Harrod's disappearance, either.''
I think the answer lies somewhere else.
It looks like PPD has someone new in mind.
So the daughters converged on Bob's house Sunday to get copies of their mother's will. But they couldn't go to his house Monday night when he was missing?
And now it wasn't a heated meeting, just Bob got heated.
[snipped]
Bob Harrod and his three daughters had an argument over finances the Sunday before he vanished.
His daughter, Roberta, acknowledged the exchange, saying her father lost his temper. She said he had failed to provide copies of their mother's will, which he was obligated to do because of the financial mechanisms set up by the estate.
"It wasn't a heated meeting," she said in a phone interview. "Dad got heated. He's very selfish, very conditional. The day before he went missing in the afternoon, he was going to provide us copies of the will, and we went over to get the copies. He didn't have them."
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/harrod-bob-police-2598739-fontelle-michaels
So the daughters converged on Bob's house Sunday to get copies of their mother's will. But they couldn't go to his house Monday night when he was missing?
And now it wasn't a heated meeting, just Bob got heated.
[snipped]
Bob Harrod and his three daughters had an argument over finances the Sunday before he vanished.
His daughter, Roberta, acknowledged the exchange, saying her father lost his temper. She said he had failed to provide copies of their mother's will, which he was obligated to do because of the financial mechanisms set up by the estate.
"It wasn't a heated meeting," she said in a phone interview. "Dad got heated. He's very selfish, very conditional. The day before he went missing in the afternoon, he was going to provide us copies of the will, and we went over to get the copies. He didn't have them."
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/harrod-bob-police-2598739-fontelle-michaels
Another thought........
Why would all three daughters need to go to their father's house to pick up a copy of the will? What were they going to do with the copy of the will?
I have read most of the news articles about Robert H.
http://www.contracostatimes.com/california/ci_12946442?nclick_check=1
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-missing-groom31-2009jul31,0,5435017.story
He and his new wife married six days after reconnecting.
Disagreement among sides of the family whether he had mild dementia or not.
On the day he disappeared, he supposedly have left for a walk, but was said to only usually walk around the neighborhood block.
He disappeared in the time period when his son in law, Jeff M, went to a Home Depot to get supplies to fix something in the house.
It was said he got into an arguement with a family member and police thought he would be home that evening.
In the news article, Robert is said to have had money.
Daughter and son in law, Jeff M, said to be his caretakers.
Is it possible that the son in law and Robert had a disagreement and something went wrong?
Maybe son in law was worried about inheritance or rather, not inheriting anything, since Robert had just up and got married?
Mind you, this is based only IMHO, as I have nothing concrete to base it on.
Just thinking out loud.
There are 3 groups of people in Bob's life who all have various degrees of interest as to whether he is better off missing versus having a body found.
He acquired an amount of wealth that is subject to debate, however it was substantial enough that he and his wife thought to preserve it in a trust before her death. It is apparently protected from future spouses and "barber friends".
After the death of his wife his "barber lady" starts hitting him up for big bucks over an 18 month period. The daughters get irate and call social services who could not go after "barber lady" because the dad would not speak out against her.
Then comes a woman out of his past, they were engaged 59 years ago, when, she was 14 and, he was old enough to know better. They reconnect, get married and then he walks off into the sunset, on his bad knees, abandoning her for a 2nd time..
All I am Asking is to look at all three groups and what each stands to lose or gain (his daughters, his new wife, and the barber lady) before forming an opinion.
Robert has not been found wandering the streets, victim of a possible stroke.
Robert has not been found, victim of a car accident or seizure.
Robert has not been found.
His car is at his house.
Did someone stop by the house?
Take Robert for a ride?
I've been following this MP on another site also. It was closed down for a while and now a new thread about it. However, I never heard any more about the car that was gone one day. I never heard if it came back or who used it, has anyone here heard any more about it?
I'm curious how long Bob's finances were an issue with the Daughters. Right after their Mother passed away, maybe? I may have just missed it before, but this is the first I have heard that Bob is a multi-millionaire.
A comment at the OCregister also refers to another site. Did you see anything along the same posted by family?
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/...RecommendedOnly=0&oncommentsPage=3#slComments
10/9/2009 4:13:52 PM
Recommend(3)
Report Abuse
flatheadedhammer wrote:
All three daughters were posting on a forum about their missing father. Nothing about searching for him.
Everything about money.....Fontelle.....trying to point the finger at others. They also had a completely different timeline in their posts. I wonder why the timeline changed.
They also said some very cruel things about their missing father. I hope the police have seen their postings.
Follow the money. What a shock it must have been to find out that their father remarried.
A comment at the OCregister also refers to another site. Did you see anything along the same posted by family?
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/...RecommendedOnly=0&oncommentsPage=3#slComments
*SNIP*
Everything about money.....Fontelle.....trying to point the finger at others. They also had a completely different timeline in their posts. I wonder why the timeline changed.
They also said some very cruel things about their missing father. I hope the police have seen their postings.
Follow the money. What a shock it must have been to find out that their father remarried.
On this thread, there were 66 posts by 'Calif Native', 17 posts by a sister 'CalifNativeI' and another relative. At first, I thought the first sister seemed very honest, fair and tried to be open minded about it all. She seemed very concerned about her father's safety/well-being.
As time went on, they quit posting, which I understood to be 'in their best interest' - not just to accidentally post info that could jeopardize the investigation, but also to not be making them look guilty.
While some posts may make them look guilty and greedy, in my own family when my grandfather passed away from cancer, my mother's sisters wanted to make sure they got MORE than their fair share of property, as my grandfather didn't leave a will.(ETA he was not rich in any way). ALL agreed the property that could be moved came to our house because my mother was considered very honest and fair, yet she was taken advantage of still. So, that colors my opinion of BH's sisters in that they could still be greedy but not necessarily guilty of causing BH to disappear. IMHO
You bring up some good points, and surely there are horror stories everywhere of greedy families fighting over estates like vultures. You're right, that doesnt mean that the family members are responsible for the deceased's passing.
In this case though, there are just so many confusing timelines and statements made, alot of misinformation put out on the web, and it seems like everything points in a certain direction. There seems to be alot of hostility and anger there. If I were in this sad situation, I can honestly say I would be at that house in a heartbeat, searching the neighborhood myself. Not posting on some messageboard.