Robert White
Verified Homeland Protection Associate
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2013
- Messages
- 73
- Reaction score
- 3
As an extreme case, it's like saying a construction worker would know how to design a building "in some professional capacity". A doctor goes through many false positives daily and even they are unable to correctly diagnose illnesses sometimes.
Okay, let us be clear that professionals are not infallible. In every field, there are many mistakes made, some because of a lack of caring, others because they just shouldn't be at the professional level. Does that apply to the entire spectrum? Not at all. Refer to my last post in regards to the standards of education and designation. They do exist for a reason, although bad apples get through all the time.
I don't know what your profession is, but I think this is the crux of the disagreement. Does a video with no sound, or other context cues qualify as reliable evidence to think she was "probably" experiencing psychosis?
No, it is certainly not reliable evidence. Then again, there is no reliable evidence. Everything is based upon a scant amount of evidence, and theories being made up from it, and their own personal and professional experiences. As I said in the past, some are great, and some aren't. Some are supported well, and some aren't. However, let me say this again. When I have the mental health individuals on this board give their opinions, and my colleagues and friends (who are LE) support this (those conversations can be found on the previous threads for transparency), I will tend to believe them, rather then question whether an assessment can be properly made. You know why? Because I can speak personally to the experience of the latter.
.I agree, a threat may not be present in the video at all. But that doesn't mean she wasn't acting rationally. Let's examine her actions and give rational explanations:
- Pressing multiple buttons - someone who doesn't want someone to know what floor they're going to may do this. Someone may do this just for *advertiser censored* and giggles. Someone may do this if they're playing a game of some sort. (although I find this unlikely, unless she's "played this game" before)
- Looking out the door both ways - if someone expects the door to close, and it doesn't, they may assume someone was holding the button from the outside and check
- Standing in the corner - someone who doesn't want to be seen, or someone who is angling at a better look at the outside button, making sure it's not being pressed
- The hop-step outside the elevator - used commonly by people wanting to make a noise with their feet, to make their presence known, especially if you suspect someone is hiding.
- Hands on her head outside the elevator - "What do I do now?" or "I think I'm getting paranoid" Non-crazy people do this too.
- Pressing the buttons again - "Why won't this stupid elevator work, damnit!"
- Swimming gestures - she could be talking to someone or to herself. It could indicate she's telling someone she can't see, or she could be pointing to the elevator as she's talking. It could mean a number of things - some people use a lot of hand gestures when they talk. Ever see a flamboyant gay man? Without audio, it's impossible to tell. It's like watching a movie without audio.
- Holding her fingers - normal people do this to emphasize points, either to themselves or to others
Well there is no point in disagreeing with this. We come from different backgrounds, and you assess it differently. I can see how you can make those conclusions and that's fine. Experience tells me otherwise, but I could very well be wrong. And if I am, I would own up to it like anyone should.
Doing something is one thing, but there needs to be a basis for it. How do I know you aren't a terrorist? I can rule out the likelihood based on your past behavior. I can see you have no motive. Or that you don't have the capability. Considering every single possibility is a waste of time.
And unfortunately, that's where you are wrong. You don't know. You may not know even if you knew me in person. There are dozens of indicators and nuances people are trained to detect, and I would strongly suspect this applies to the mental health field. People have become so caught up in fact that there is no evidence of previous behaviour. And from what? Social media posts, main stream media, her friends? You are never getting the whole story. You are speculating on the personality and past of someone you don't know - not even a little bit. Again, I go back to the terrorism aspect. We have seen such breaks in molds, we don't even know who to consider. Families come forward and say, "that can't be my son, he was a 4.0 GPA science student - he has no past, blah blah." Its easy to show the side you want to show.
I'll look at this later, thanks.
Anyways, we have detracted enough from the real case. We know where we stand, and I respect what you have to say. We may disagree, and I believe that to be a product of our backgrounds both in profession/personal experience. Nothing wrong with that.