I also heard on IS just now that a group of medical students drank propofol as an experiment and no one felt the affects of it.
I forgot which country the test was done in but Walgren is wanting the study to come in.
IMO
This is from September 7th:
"At a hearing today, the judge ruled that jurors can hear from a prosecution witness about a study done on piglets involving propofol.
Pastor said he saw no basis for precluding Dr. Steven Shafer, a prosecution expert witness, from testifying in Murray's trial about a study of intravenous and rectal administration of propofol in piglets.
The defense had objected to Shafer -- whom the prosecution referred to as an "internationally recognized expert in the field of anesthesiology and pharmacology" -- testifying about the study, which was published in an international anesthesiology journal.
The judge deferred a ruling on the defense's objection to Shafer's testimony about a second study in Chile in which six students volunteered to drink propofol and submit to blood testing at various intervals. That study, which was recently done, has not been published yet, according to Deputy District Attorney David Walgren.
In court papers filed today, Walgren wrote that Shafer has "previously opined that the defendant conducted multiple egregious and unconscionable violations of the standard of care and that `there is almost nothing in Murray's care of Michael Jackson that reflected the actions of a trained physician."'
The prosecutor noted that Shafer believes there is "zero possibility that the propofol was orally ingested."
http://www.myfoxla.com/dpp/news/local/court-murray-trial-jury-won't-be-sequestered-20110907