Robin Hood
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2010
- Messages
- 1,340
- Reaction score
- 198
Colette I'm flattered you think it's just my Judaism theory, people far smarter than myself have and are still seriously considering it's worth.
I wondered if the woman's penis size comment was just her way of getting back at her attacker. Is that something a woman would acually be thinking about while she was being raped? I'd hate to see the guy released without a DNA test when a cop said, "Whosa! He can't be the guy."
I wondered if the woman's penis size comment was just her way of getting back at her attacker. Is that something a woman would acually be thinking about while she was being raped? I'd hate to see the guy released without a DNA test when a cop said, "Whosa! He can't be the guy."
LE noticed the Nazi White Supremacist connection, that's why Paul "Cornfed" Schneider A high-ranking member of the Aryan Brotherhood prison gang came under the microscope.
I am thinking that if there was reason to look at one "Nazi white supremacist", then there is reason to look at others as well. I don't know of any direct link that Schneider had with the case. So was there actual crime scene evidence that sent Poole in that direction?
I've always wondered that. If there's nothing from the scene then LE went that way because somebody saw the link with the names all having a similar ring to them. I guess the only thing to do is check what Schneider was doing and where.
Yeah, you know that is something I always wondered about. Why they looked at cornfed. I remember hearing something about an alpha beta store, but that was it. I think you are definitely on to something here. Please keep going robin hood and dew claw.
Those murders from 1962 are way too early to be the work of EAR/ONS. Not only that neither one was sexually assaulted and they are too old to be the typical EAR/ONS victims.
The VR was said to be young in the early 70's. He would have been maybe 10 yrs old at the most in 1962. IMO
The poi I speak of was taken in by LE for questioning when two people independently called his name in to them in relation to the VR attacks, another person independently named him in relation to him being the East Area Rapist, so not everybody would agree with you.
I really have trouble understanding what the DNA is telling us. From what I have read, there is no DNA from the Sac crimes. And according to one detective, he built a shed for the remaining evidence and case files in the back of the station yard, and that someone had thrown the files away. The DNA is connected to the Southern Cal crimes and three crimes in CCC. So Sac and Visalia aren't connected by DNA evidence. Furthermore, there are numerous witness accounts of possible accomplices and varying attacker descriptions. There are varying descriptions of his penis size, his height, his eye color, and his body style. It seems the most common explanation that I have read is that the witnesses or the police reports are wrong. But what if they aren't? I would think that should change the way the case is handled. And yet LE is completely resistant to discussing that.
RH, could the poi you referred to have any potential accomplices?