this post - :cheers: - no matter what my opinion has been on any case such as, lets say i stick up for a suspect who has a past record but the evidence hasn't been revealed so i believe it is too early to convict (but everyone else sounds sure he's the perp) or, maybe i believed it was the husband who is guilty because i'm aware of statistics and heard the couple was in the midst of splitting up, or, i decide it must be some mysterious awful thing within a victim's family because the brother acts weird (tho i wasn't there just going by what is reported), almost every single time i try to take a side/leaning (especially when there's been little evidence released in the case), it backfires on me! We just don't know without being privy to the evidence ourselves. Some times rumors do surface that end up being part of the story but that's in hindsight.
For these reasons, i try to walk the fence while we are waiting for a break in the case.
Remember the young lady who worked in a veterinarian clinic who went missing, left her dog behind, and was found wandering around florida? Her car was found days earlier in a parking lot. I never would have predicted that happy outcome. Wonder how she's doing today? Anyway, we speculated up and down and all around on that case as we do surrounding almost all cases.
All that said, some of the husband cases are quite clear from the beginning imo. Even then, there must be a trial first before we hear all the evidence.
uh oh, has there been new info released on erin's case?