debbiegarcia36
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2015
- Messages
- 1,318
- Reaction score
- 1,540
Deleted, already answered.
What is CAM? I'm having trouble with acronyms tonight. TIA.
imo
Yes, this had been over eight years of time ( till 2008). There were three names connected to this NGO (the two founder and another long-serving member). I traced their professional profiles on LinkedIn, SM and news through some local community sites. Not much activities in this particular field, though they participate in some charity and relief work, mainly through church/es, locally and overseas. None have ever mentioned the Hart family AFIK. jmo omo
Few links and data:
- This is the Twitter account of the now-defunct agency that handled the children adoption from Texas. They showed an ad by the couple seeking adopting 1-3 more children. They used a photo of Markis and Devonte as their profile pic. Their bio reads: Influencing and changing the lives of children by securing supportive, loving, and permanent families for them in Minnesota across state lines. They clearly changed those children's lives!
https://twitter.com/permanentfamily
- The NGO worked mostly on children from Texas. In 2009, out of 46 children adopted, "35 were from Texas."
- I found a thread about 'grey/ gray arket adobtion' on your forum https://www.websleuths.com/forums/s...ies-and-leads/page2&highlight=permanentfamily Entry number 263 by user Mum mentioned this NGO :
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/s...tion-Theories-and-leads&p=4814064#post4814064
- The couple's ad on the NGO site below (from Internet Archive as the website is no longer available):
Family Name: Jennifer & Sara H.
# of Children In Home: 3
Characteristics of Family: Jen and Sarah are experienced parents that have fostered one child and have adopted three children; Markis, Hannah & Abigail. They are a fun, active family. The whole family is eager to open their hearts and their home to adopted children.
Gender: Either; at least one boy
Age Range: 0-8
Ethnicity: Any
# Children Desired: 1-3
Most of us treat our children very well. "Festival people" is a very broad term that encompasses literally millions of people. As with any "group" (and festival goers are not actually a "group", despite the way they're talked about on here), you find both good and "bad" parents. You'll find the same in any subculture. It is either neither better nor worse than with anyone else. Some parents are fantastic, some are abusive, but that's what you would find in any sampling.
Sarah and Jen were good manipulators. They pulled the wool over lots of people's eyes.
To be fair all parents sometimes get stressed sometimes.
BBM. Yes. Nascar fans, Parrotheads, Opera buffs: whatever the affinity group is, the sad truth is that you'll find some bad parents in it. I don't think I've ever read anything that says a particular group stands out from the rest as being significantly worse. They were two very good (and obviously articulate) manipulators who were willing to do whatever it took to do what they wanted to do. That speaks to who they were as people, not what their hobbies/interests were.
Thank you Koshka.
I thought discussion of festival atmospheres and "festival people" had been declared OT by mod sillybilly in thread #6, as the sweeping generalizations being put forth were unhelpful to the search for Devonte and Hannah, or to furthering discussion of the Harts' known abuses and legal issues. I really was hoping that snark had ended.
JMO, MOO, etc.
~/~ festival person and parent ~/~
Bumping these links, so many details are there. These kids tried and tried and were let down time and again. This **** needs to change. It is an absolute outrage. No child should have to endure what these children did. This is becoming so like the Turpins only festivals & rallies instead of Disney and Vegas.
Children not allowed to speak, had to raise their hands.
Disciplined for laughing at the dinner table
Markis made a strange comment about waiting till everyone else ate to see if there was anything left.
Kids were only fed "tiny portions" and were not allowed seconds.
Kids would eat freely if JH was not around, but as soon as she came in, they would stop and deny they ate.
JH would have the children do yoga, but she would have them do positions that were uncomfortable for too long.
Witnessed JH grab and drag Markis upstairs.
Children not allowed to cry. JH does not like to have the kids alone with anyone.
SH described as very cold to the children.
It was noted during CPS involvement that Abigail was 6 but looked as though she was 2 years old.
1/4/2011 Children in the classroom had been giving Hannah food and/or she's been approaching classmates for food.
1/14/11 Hannah reported to the School Nurse she had not eaten that day. (Followed up by banana & nuts shoved in her mouth by an angry JH, because Hannah was disrespectful. SH's response was "she's playing the food card, just give her water". )
After awhile the MN school stopped calling the parents about the children taking food because they didn't want the children disciplined or punished.
JH makes up extravagant stories to make herself appear a hero.
It just goes on and on.
I was on the fence about Hannah's teeth. I'm convinced now they were pulled intentionally and it was food related punishment. Teaching her a lesson, making it more difficult for her to eat.
I was thinking the kids were cooperative for photo ops because they might be rewarded with food. Now I'm thinking they cooperated so that more food than would not be withheld.
This was all some kind of sick, twisted sham. And given all the underwear photos and videos out there, it would not be shocking in the least to discover far more nefarious things going on. MOO
Is there another link to the report? It has been removed from Scribd.
The abuse only seemed escalate as the years went by. The DeKalbs were unaware of any children living next door until Hannah ran over.
That is crazy. Six kids especially preteen/teens, are loud!
They must have had them so weak from starvation the had no energy
Instead, they probably died thinking they were thought of as heros, martyrs who gave it all up for their family.
I dont think I have hated someone I dont know this much.
- Thanks.Amazing find. Here's something I'm not understanding. This ad is supposedly from when they had already adopted the first three children, and were looking to adopt up to three more, which I assume were Devonte, Jeremiah, and Ciara. Is that correct? If so, how do the pictures include Devonte if they hadn't adopted him yet ? Is that picture from a different source? Or were they looking to adopt more children after they already had six, but didn't update the number of children in the home?
They didn’t want the foster teen because she wanted to use wire hangers? I took it to mean the teen wanted to use those to hang her clothes instead of plastic? Why is that a reason to give up a child. Am I missing something here? Those two were evil witches.
I took it to mean a big crock of **** and a twisted hat-tip to "Mommie Dearest."
[video=youtube;XOILKHmZBwc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOILKHmZBwc[/video]
I took it to mean a big crock of **** and a twisted hat-tip to "Mommie Dearest."
[video=youtube;XOILKHmZBwc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOILKHmZBwc[/video]