CA CA - Heidi Planck, 39, left son’s football game in Downey, dog found in Los Angeles, 17 Oct 2021 #2

[DeDee]

Missing mom's boyfriend who thought she 'ghosted' him is Zuckerberg charity exec

Now, it has emerged that the single mom had been dating Na’eem Salaam, 43, who works for the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative as a vice president for operations, according to his Linked-In account.

The organization is owned by Facebook founder Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan.

Stanford-educated Na’eem’s mom Amirah confirmed to The Sun that he had been dating Heidi and gasped "oh no" when told that she had gone missing.

 

[Curiosa20]

So dear Sleuthers-
Check these RHD areas of work out. Scroll through the special Units.
I think the Gang Unit is working in Heidi’s case, at least. What do you think?
Robbery-Homicide Division RHD - LAPD Online

 

[Curiosa20]

Here is the link to NG from that post

JW says in this that he got the cell phone from her house after the missing persons report was filed... He says D brought the phone to him the next day.... but he says he went there to get it with D and D says she got the phone??? am i losing my mind?? the first 2 minutes of that clip have me so confused...

It’s the two different phones. The girlfriend gave JW one on the 18th. Supposedly the perdonal/back up ohone.
He went to do the wellness check with LE at the house on the 21 and found rhe workphone and laptops upstairs, after filing the Missing Person report on the 20th. They cops couldn’t take the phones and laps until the warrant was issued days later.
That’s why there was all the dialogue about finding the texts for the dog, the argument with Heidi’s boss’s personal assistant about giving them the work laptop Jim had in his posesión and then gave to LE.
It’s very messy and compounded by very sloppy reporting and a stressed out father and ex and friends who are all afraid to talk but have a need to . keep the case in the news.
But we can sort it out!

 

[Curiosa20]

Here is the link to NG from that post

JW says in this that he got the cell phone from her house after the missing persons report was filed... He says D brought the phone to him the next day.... but he says he went there to get it with D and D says she got the phone??? am i losing my mind?? the first 2 minutes of that clip have me so confused...

Thank you!!

 

[Curiosa20]

Very! And it sounds personal, IMO.

Yes!!!
I have been very suspicious of the doggie finders from the get- go. That story and timeline just doesn’t add up in my mind.

 

[slowpoke]

Yes. Then they went back with LE in 21st and got the other ohone and laptops. Personal and work. Apparently.
The transcript is on page 36

At 26:50, Nancy Grace says: “So, now we have one phone, and we’re missing another phone.”
Crime Stories with Nancy Grace
(11/3/21)

 

[slowpoke]

snipped:

“Then I found the text message,’Hey, are you lonely without a dog?’

I don’t think we can trust that publication. While they say it’s from The Sun, if you look at The Sun’s article, the quote is: ““Then I found a text message that said ‘Hey, are you missing a dog?’”New clues revealed in missing mom mystery from odd text to multiple phones

 

[Knox]

There’s new video footage from HP’s home a day or two after she was last seen.
https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/video/6154000-more-video-evidence-found-in-heidi-planck-case/?amp
More Video Evidence Found in Heidi Planck Case – KCAL9 and CBS2 News, Sports, and Weather

What was Sugarman doing? Heidi hadn't shown up for work or answered his calls. So he does a doorbell ring and muffin drop? God this case is bizarre

 

[Curiosa20]

snipped:


I don’t think we can trust that publication. While they say it’s from The Sun, if you look at The Sun’s article, the quote is: ““Then I found a text message that said ‘Hey, are you missing a dog?’”New clues revealed in missing mom mystery from odd text to multiple phones

I totally agree. I was just researching that quote and it came from a rehashed bad translation from an online Chinese news service.
The Sun interview is more coherent, but still not clear about how the finders got Heidi’s number from a retrofitted chip.

 

[Curiosa20]

At 26:50, Nancy Grace says: “So, now we have one phone, and we’re missing another phone.”
Crime Stories with Nancy Grace
(11/3/21)

I saw that line tacked on with no context at the very end of the interview. It doesn’t make sense and contradicts the interview and the multiple loud and clear statements JW has made about finding and having the two phones.

 

[Curiosa20]

What was Sugarman doing? Heidi hadn't shown up for work or answered his calls. So he does a doorbell ring and muffin drop? God this case is bizarre

Welp, she was his Controller. Maybe they had an appontment.

 

[swedeheart]

 

[Curiosa20]

Dateline interview about the second phone/work phone and laptop found in home on the 21st.
Remember, the first phone, personal, was found by her friend on the 18th, per her friend and JW.
When he says “left behind” he means she left them in her house where he found them!


The home was in pristine condition,” he said. “But her phone and laptops were left behind."

Jim said one of the texts received on Heidi’s phone was from a woman who had found Heidi’s dog, who was chipped, and tried to contact Heidi.
Mystery surrounds disappearance of Los Angeles mother after leaving son’s football game last month

 

[slowpoke]

I saw that line tacked on with no context at the very end of the interview. It doesn’t make sense and contradicts the interview and the multiple loud and clear statements JW has made about finding and having the two phones.

I’m not seeing the situation with the two phones the way you do. I still think one phone is missing. JMO But, I’ll leave it at that, not wanting to create more confusion and distraction from Heidi’s case.

 

[swedeheart]

Gray has been covering updates on the case for the last few nights, and I am looking very forward to a future show (today, Friday, I believe) where he (and Chasing Truth) dig deeper. Be watching for that one on his other channel, So Mean, Allegedly.

Here's some Google Map coverage of the main points of interest (starts about 12 mins in, video from yesterday):

 

[fraudqueen]

I was just thinking about Witness Protection....

 

[bears10]

If her name is on documents that she did not sign, that are fraudulent, then the person who put her name there may need her gone because the SEC is investigating. They don't want her to tell the SEC she did not sign them.

The only thing we know she signed was annual corporate reports, digitally. Not a biggie. Jmo

 

[bears10]

As controller over the CC business, HP would know every dime the company held and how it was acquired. It is one of the most important positions within a multimillion dollar business.

A friend held a similar position when the mega company was about to go under leaving shareholders with massive financial losses. He shared details of contemplating killing himself, for example, by driving his car at dangerous speeds on the dark drive home each evening. He knew the truth was about to be revealed to the public and his involvement would shame his family and his lovely wife's family.

As life would have it, my cousin worked in the same dept as he was her boss. She resigned over the dirty deeds of 'cooking the books' and sought employment elsewhere which was a wise decision as the main office holders all went to prison. The CEO and founder of the company died in prison last year.


"Her boss, Jason Sugarman, is accused of stealing "$43 million from unwitting pension funds to finance the acquisition of a global financial conglomerate of European and Bermuda insurers, and investment advisers based in Virginia and Connecticut" according to legal documents..."

Missing mom's boss ‘probed over a $43M fraud’ as sleuths seek LinkedIn clues

I honestly think she was more of a bookkeeper and/or assistant. It’s not uncommon for small businesses to give their employees official sounding titles in order to 1) make the employee feel proud (I can’t think of a better word yet, I need coffee lol) and 2) to make the company sound more professional

 

[?!?]

If her name is on documents that she did not sign, that are fraudulent, then the person who put her name there may need her gone because the SEC is investigating. They don't want her to tell the SEC she did not sign them.

Or that she signed them under duress.

 

[?!?]

I honestly think she was more of a bookkeeper and/or assistant. It’s not uncommon for small businesses to give their employees official sounding titles in order to 1) make the employee feel proud (I can’t think of a better word yet, I need coffee lol) and 2) to make the company sound more professional

and 3) to establish a 'fall guy/gal' when the principal knows the books have been 'cooked.'