It was in testimony. None of what you post has any weight in fact. All this speculation has been discounted by the defendant. His own words.I have no idea to what you're even referring to.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was in testimony. None of what you post has any weight in fact. All this speculation has been discounted by the defendant. His own words.I have no idea to what you're even referring to.
Testimony from who? About what? And when?It was in testimony. None of what you post has any weight in fact. All this speculation has been discounted by the defendant. His own words.
Any specifics? Otherwise it's just an ad hoc argument without merit.None of what you post has any weight in fact
In the OP Maline said there is no used boarding pass and no proof DK was in HI from Feb. 4 - 6. Wish either side would produce the evidence.
In the OP Maline said there is no used boarding pass and no proof DK was in HI from Feb. 4 - 6. Wish either side would produce the evidence.
By he, do you mean Kavanaugh?Despite all this. Were you aware that the defendant said during the investigation that he was headed home on 2/17?
Yes, I see that (now). Thanks.
Was he ever in jail? Why would he be searching for “character reference letters for court” in conjunction with “what to do before you go to jail,” as well as his own name, the McStays, and wiping everything out of Facebook?
Yes, I see that (now). Thanks.
Was he ever in jail? Why would he be searching for “character reference letters for court” in conjunction with “what to do before you go to jail,” as well as his own name, the McStays, and wiping everything out of Facebook?
The prosecution doesn't need to provide an alibi for DK, or any other characters.Contrary to what many here seem to believe the DT is not prosecuting DK. If the PT wants the jury to believe that LE investigators actually established the fact that DK was in Hawaii at the time of the murders, as they testified to, then they’d better show corroborating evidence to support their claim.
Also, when was DK asked for his used boarding pass? In 2013 0r 2014? I wouldn't expect he'd have it then.
Testimony from who? About what? And when?
Any specifics? Otherwise it's just an ad hoc argument without merit.
Yes.By he, do you mean Kavanaugh?
No clue. Maybe if the DT calls DK we’ll find out.
It was in cross with Imes. Were you aware that the defendant told the detectives on 2/17 that DK was on his way home from HI?Testimony from who? About what? And when?
Any specifics? Otherwise it's just an ad hoc argumen t without merit.
I don't think they are going to call DK. That makes it seem like the DT's theory is plausible.
But Imes did ask that the computer expert be held for recross. So I do wonder if they plan to call him during rebuttal, and look more closely at the exhibits.
Are they going to show the important dates, Feb 2nd through 5th, and look at debit card transactions, phone data and look at the airline receipts during the rebuttal?
That's who I thought but just wanted to make sure. I thought at one time Chase told investigators Kavanaugh had been in Hawaii even longer but I don't remember exactly what he said.Yes.
But CM had no independent knowledge that DK was in Hawaii other than what DK told him. Of course DK is going to be telling anybody that will listen that he wasn't in the area at the time of the murders, he obviously needed to create an alibi. You didn't hear CM doing so because he would have no reason at the time to think he would ever need an alibi.Were you aware that the defendant told the detectives on 2/17 that DK was on his way home from HI?
They don't 'need' to but if they expect to sell their damaged hypothesis to the jury they'd better step up and do so, unless, as I suspect no such evidence exist.The prosecution doesn't need to provide an alibi for DK, or any other characters.
But DK was in Hawaii.But CM had no independent knowledge that DK was in Hawaii other than what DK told him. Of course DK is going to be telling anybody that will listen that he wasn't in the area at the time of the murders, he obviously needed to create an alibi. You didn't hear CM doing so because he would have no reason at the time to think he would ever need an alibi.