missy1974
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2008
- Messages
- 10,142
- Reaction score
- 31,356
I just know these things, Missy.
Good enough for me... just cuz it's you
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just know these things, Missy.
You can’t make this stuff up.anddddd we are done for the day cuz McGee isn't there to continue to question the witness.
You can’t make this stuff up.
I think it is to do with the truck video reconstruction evidence.I hope we aren't going back to the spatter on the table!
Well, it's controversial is all I will say. Yes, the red brown spatter was on the legs too.Thank you. Have not been able to listen to testimony. I did catch a bit from yesterday and saw for the first time that the blood spatter was in the legs of the table, too. Do I have that right? Common sense would lead us to believe the table had been moved and maybe turned since the house had been cleaned somewhat.
SShhhhhh!!! don't give them ideas!How long before they want to pull the Cameras again?!
At least Dan was smart enough to not announce he was going to butcher them to death.LOL! You are funny! Maybe you didn't read further down the exchange between DK and JM, you can check "your" link:
Dan says: ill give u a gentlemans promise
Dan says: since were bros for years
Dan says: and i dont hate you
Dan says: we just had a falling out
Dan says: were buddies
Dan says: u think i want to **** with u like that
Dan says: wrong
Dan says: ill respect your site
Dan says: and your future with ur family
Dan says: and even help u with the site still
Dan says: with ppc, seo
"You certainly believe something that is false." LOL! Good one!
To continuously bring it up is redundant as it is irrelevant. It's two guys having an argument through IM a whole year before. Dan was still calling him "Bro" up to the disappearance and Joseph was still telling Dan personal things like being in the hospital. These two were still very much on good terms.That is SOOOOO out of context, you might want to read the entire exchange. it's about the website, NOT doing physical/deadly harm to the McStays.
Well, they were for a time.You seem to be under the assumption that DK and the family were working together in this regard. Why do you think this?
However, there's no evidence at all of JM and CM ever having an argument. Why then do you and others contend that they were not in good terms?To continuously bring it up is redundant as it is irrelevant. It's two guys having an argument through IM a whole year before. Dan was still calling him "Bro" up to the disappearance and Joseph was still telling Dan personal things like being in the hospital. These two were still very much on good terms.
My comment was a reply to the statement below that mrjitty made.Well, they were for a time.
Is it your understanding that DK was helping the family save the business?If DK and the family do nothing, then "the business" is swiftly worth nothing.
However, there's no evidence at all of JM and CM ever having an argument. Why then do you and others contend that they were not in good terms?
I'm aware of that.My comment was a reply to the statement below that mrjitty made.
I'm sorry......what???However, there's no evidence at all of JM and CM ever having an argument. Why then do you and others contend that they were not in good terms?