I have this feeling. I think McGee may show. I would if I had been falsely maligned.The judge told the jurors he would see them on Monday, the 13th. Maybe the status meeting will take place before the hearing, if at all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have this feeling. I think McGee may show. I would if I had been falsely maligned.The judge told the jurors he would see them on Monday, the 13th. Maybe the status meeting will take place before the hearing, if at all.
IF McGee has produced a medical certificate declaring him unfit for work, he doesn't have to show up at court tomorrow, regardless of what others have accused him of doing. I'm thinking the judge already knows that little outburst from Imes was just...well, Imes being spiteful. I guess we will see tomorrow. Whatever the outcome, if there is one, concerning McGee, I hope the PT remain in their seats instead of acting like they've ants in their pants and can't sit still lol. MOOI have this feeling. I think McGee may show. I would if I had been falsely maligned.
So no jury tomorrow? I remember Imes requesting a "status meeting" regarding McGee at the earliest Monday.
Well, maybe not. McGee has thrown a monkey wrench in closing this out. He is calling the shots, IMO. Can't blame the PT for jumping out of their skin. They are ret to go. (in the words of the ugly girl from In Living Color) . MOO.IF McGee has produced a medical certificate declaring him unfit for work, he doesn't have to show up at court tomorrow, regardless of what others have accused him of doing. I'm thinking the judge already knows that little outburst from Imes was just...well, Imes being spiteful. I guess we will see tomorrow. Whatever the outcome, if there is one, concerning McGee, I hope the PT remain in their seats instead of acting like they've ants in their pants and can't sit still lol. MOO
Yeah exactly, can you imagine if the PT were still dithering around with their part in this Trial, LOL.Well, maybe not. McGee has thrown a monkey wrench in closing this out. He is calling the shots, IMO. Can't blame the PT for jumping out of their skin. They are ret to go. (in the words of the ugly girl from In Living Color) . MOO.
Considering there is less than 20 hours per week of actual productive courtroom time I wouldn't hold your breath:I hope this Trial is done by Christmas 2019,
I am not sure there are any days that there were 5 hours of testimony lol Can't even use the video's to add it up because they edit themConsidering there is less than 20 hours per week of actual productive courtroom time I wouldn't hold your breath:
9:30 am - 12:00 = 2.5
12 - 1:30 pm = lunch
1:30 pm - 4:00 pm = 2.5
4 days per week (at BEST) x 5 hours per day (at BEST) minus "recess" for a total of LESS THAN 20 HOURS PER WEEK! Unfreakingbelievable.
Two things Imes has yet to provide: proof that Chase is guilty; proof that McGee is not ill. What does he have? Nothing. Hopefully, he will not scream "objection" to McGee's doctor.
Between recesses, side bars, bickering, etc. I'm positive there has never been a full 5 hours of testimony in the State vs Merritt trial. I do know that unless we are judges employed by San Bernardino County we're in the wrong line of work. LolI am not sure there are any days that there were 5 hours of testimony lol Can't even use the video's to add it up because they edit them
After all is said and done I hope the jury speaks out. Really curious to know if the length of the trial bothered them? Maybe not since they committed to 3/4 months in the beginning? It's like a grand jury, to me.Between recesses, side bars, bickering, etc. I'm positive there has never been a full 5 hours of testimony in the State vs Merritt trial. I do know that unless we are judges employed by San Bernardino County we're in the wrong line of work. Lol
I'm actually quite impressed that only one juror has had to bow out. To me that speaks to their level of commitment and how serious they take their positions as a jurors in a quadruple murder case. I think we can count on them to come to the same conclusion that most have already come to and hand down a guilty verdict.After all is said and done I hope the jury speaks out. Really curious to know if the length of the trial bothered them? Maybe not since they committed to 3/4 months in the beginning? It's like a grand jury, to me.
Fingers crossed.I'm actually quite impressed that only one juror has had to bow out. To me that speaks to their level of commitment and how serious they take their positions as a jurors in a quadruple murder case. I think we can count on them to come to the same conclusion that most have already come to and hand down a guilty verdict.
I sort of expect a "show-down" tomorrow on McGee's drinking & dancing. I can hear it now...."Judge, I emphatically deny that I am faking any sort of illness and I truly cannot handle my defense duties at this time. As for drinking & dancing - it was an alka-selzter I had...and by the way, I had to be escorted to the dance floor with a walker. And I used my cane the entire time I danced the Macarena."
Can you picture it? LOL
View attachment 184009
Cathy Russon @cathyrusson 1h1 hour ago
#McStay - Prosecution tells the judge during arguments over Kavanaugh this morning, "There are reasons we didn't call him and those reasons are protected by work product."
Does discovery mean that the prosecution has to reveal its case strategy?
No. Discovery rules generally distinguish between raw information like names of witnesses, police reports, and drug or alcohol test results, and attorney theories and strategies. The latter is called “work product.” Prosecutors don’t have to turn over their work product to defendants—otherwise, it just wouldn’t be fair. Lawyers would be incentivized to hide their work or do less of it
This was discussed in the last thread, but I don’t think we had a decisive answer as to what work product meant.
I just ran across this—Nolo.com. Discovery: What and When the Prosecution Must Disclose
So—they didn’t call DK, and that was part of their trial strategy, which they don’t have to reveal.
Actually Merritt's own criminal record proves he's a thief.
One can say he's not a murderer a zillion times but that doesn't make it true.