I was going to do a critique on the article but the writing/formatting was so bad i felt it doesn't deserve the effort.
I am still waiting for anyone, including the defence to address the big question below.
I find it fascinating and revealing that Forensic Man didn't address it, and since then the defence studiously ignored the matter.
I find it odd that very important question is never answered.
Why? Imo, because there is no other reasonable conclusion or answer that can explain it any other way than exactly what it shows.
Imo, this is the very reason the DT has really tried to ignore the huge white elephant in the room.
The same reason they haven't tried to shore up CM non verifiable alibi whereabouts during all of the times in question.
What has been shown to the jury though is DKs whereabouts have been backed up by documentation the jury can hold in their hands, and see for themselves being able to review them.
Since CM seemed so busy, and out, and about a lot where are his own documents showing his whereabouts?
He paid cash because no one would accept anything other than cash, but all cash customers receive invoices marked paid to have for their own accounting records. Who was doing CMs accounting at the time? Surely he would be able to prove even one location he was at during the important timeline paying cash for materials?
But nope, nothing but crickets chirping. Was CJ asked if he brought any paid invoices home during these periods?
All self employed business owners keep all invoices they have paid since all are deductions that will reduce their taxes owed.
So where are CM documents showing his different locations on the days in question like the documentation evidence which has been entered on DKs whereabouts?
Its interesting the state has produced hard evidence of DKs whereabouts, yet the DT has failed to do the same for the accused. Imo, which is a far more important matter for the jury. Imo, the jury wants to see CMs verified documented alibi since he is the man on trial.
Oh btw, where is the credit card receipt showing Joey had paid for their lunch on the 4th as CM has said happened? Nothing this defendant has said is ever backed up with any verifiable proof. Hmmm, coincidence? I think not.
Narcissists believe their lies will simply be believed without question. CM thought the same. He really felt he could trick the police into accepting all of his lies.
After all he had spent his adult life honing his craft as a career conman. He thought he owned the interviews with LE.
CM thought he had this in the bag, easy peasy, thinking his deceitful life would continue with him walking away unscathed.
However, narcissists, and pathological liars often become their own worst enemy in the end, especially when they become cold blooded murderers.
JMHOO