imstilla.grandma
Believer of Miracles
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2018
- Messages
- 33,042
- Reaction score
- 224,058
I’ve been following pretty closely since the beginning of the case and as far as I know, there’s been no info about phone pings- simply that the phone has been out of service since the party.Hi all, just catching up here. Did her phone last ping at the campground that evening, or has LE been able to follow any pings leading out of the campground at all, do you know?
Thanks! Maybe that's why they're leaning toward abduction - perhaps they know it did just last ping at the campground and no teenager is ever without their phone, so it could have been turned off by someone else.I’ve been following pretty closely since the beginning of the case and as far as I know, there’s been no info about phone pings- simply that the phone has been out of service since the party.
I can’t find it now, but I’m quite sure the original search on Saturday included drone and helicopter flyovers of the campgrounds, and I swear it included the reservoir and/or dam area. This may be from her mother’s first Facebook post Saturday evening though, which I’m not sure has been approved or will be.Prosser Lake is 99 feet at it's deepest, which is right next to the dam and not easily driveble, not near the shore
It should take only a drone flyover to figure out if there is a vehicle in there or a quick review by divers (although at 5700 ft it's a high-altitude, riskier dive). The area around the shoreline where one would drive a car into the reservoir is maximally 40 ft and all of it is regularly examined, in a way, by the scans on boats fishing in it.
California law requires a person to be at least 18 years of age in order legally to get a tattoo. In fact, according to Penal Code 653 PC, it is a criminal offense to “ink” or administer a tattoo to a minor under the age of 18.Maybe I'm lost in translation but I think the law doesn't say that getting or having a tattoo under the age of 18 is a crime. What's forbidden (in California) is to perform a tattoo on a person under the age of 18.
But anyways it doesn't seem relevant to this case.
Highly unlikely:I wonder if her vehicle had any sort of tracking or roadside assistance on it? Whatever the Honda version of Onstar is.
Impaired people can make rash decisions that make no sense; that’s the problem. When you’re too drunk to drive, in many cases you are too drunk to know you are too drunk to drive. Perhaps even more so at that age.I'm also curious what made Kiely want to leave and drive home if she had been planning on staying the night, especially if she wasn't in a good state to drive. Did she get into a fight with a friend, significant other, or other party goer? Was someone there making her uncomfortable? Did she start not feeling well?
I’m sure it depends on trim level, but my 2014 CRV did not have any type of HondaLink/roadside assistance/satellite GPS on it. I think it became more standard for Hondas just a year or two after - 2015/2016.I wonder if her vehicle had any sort of tracking or roadside assistance on it? Whatever the Honda version of Onstar is.
From my travels in the area...
The west side of 89 to the North had bad cell service.
The east side (on the roads toward Verdi) had service.
To the south, you are basically in the 80 corridor and cell service is generally strong.
If she (or someone) didn't turn her phone off, then I would be focusing closer on areas with bad cell service...even more helpful to narrow down the carrier and base bad areas off that... Verizon has much better coverage in the area than others.
Unless her battery died, but usually one would be able to charge their phone in their vehicle...
You and me both.I'm going to guess that this law may be mainly used by parents who find out their child got a tattoo without their permission and want the person who did the tattoo punished. I'd be unhappy if my minor child got a tattoo and I had no idea about the hygiene and safety of the person doing the tattoo. Unclean needles can spread disease.