VeryVeritas
Former Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2010
- Messages
- 1,250
- Reaction score
- 2,898
My apologies for delayed response. Did not receive notification. If you go back and read from the beginning of this thread, you will learn many interesting details. There are details about JO which do connect him to human trafficking. (just one link is the now deceased Dubey). The problem with JO is he was a shady person with even shadier associations making anything not just possible, but his involvement extremely likely. Some of the key things are the pages torn from JL’s diary for those days few days around Kristen’s disappearance. Wish that JL was public about what was on those pages and why they were torn out. Her co-worker was also tied to JL and JO. That is too much to be a random coincidence. Nonetheless, LE to date has not found sufficient evidence to charge anyone.If Onuma and Lampo are involved (which I think they are, just my opinion) I would have to say they got lucky as not being named suspects yet, just only remaining as a POI . They are only tied to one case of a missing and presumed dead person, that of course being KM and I can't see them being the type to those couples who go around murdering people. What I always wondered was IF Jon and JL are involved, what made KM different and why would Onuma (under the presumption) murder her?
Also when you said did LE do a really bad job, I'd say they did not do the best job but not horrible. It didn't help that she was reported missing three days after she was last seen, then the 48 hour wait period to begin a missing adult persons case, then it becomes Friday and the lead investigators on the case go home for the weekend. It became a whole week before investigation fully starts AND the family had to convince LE that KM was some typical runaway. If I had to grade LE and the work they did on this I would say D+.
These cases where the person may have been trafficked and/or murdered where there is no trace of a body, indicate planning. The fact that she did not clock out, and always had done so before is a red flag. We can take each one of these known facts and put them i to a theory, or remove any combination of facts as just coincidence. Some of them might be coincidence, but all of them? Whomever did this seems to have planned something, maybe murder was not the goal, maybe it was. But they knew how to cover it up, and that should narrow the profile. It doesn’t rule out her roommates, or halfway house neighbors. Yet, it is most likely, that she knew the person(s) responsible. Someone directly and/or peripheral.