Sonny Crockett
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2021
- Messages
- 659
- Reaction score
- 3,820
Thanks for all of the feedback re: my posts, everyone. This is a great board!
Thanks for the clarification. Yes, I fully & completely agree that the authorities should be certain beyond a doubt that someone committed a crime before arresting/charging them. Unfortunately, we all know there were/are innocent people in prison - which is something that should never happen.
I'm just surprised that it took 25 years in this case, given that PF was always felt to be the #1 suspect. Of course, we don't really know what led up to this arrest; until more details are given out, everything we discuss is just speculative.
Why so long for an arrest?
It's important to recognize that while circumstantial evidence may satisfy probable cause required for an arrest warrant, it does not necessarily satisfy evidentiary proof beyond a reasonable doubt that's required to prosecute a case (i.e, a much higher standard than called for at a preliminary hearing, which is just a strong suspicion of guilt).
Justice is never served when there's an arrest and the case is dismissed for insufficient (circumstantial) evidence to prosecute the accused. Double jeopardy prevents prosecutors from again charging the accused with the same crime, even if he confesses or new evidence later surfaces!
Prosecutors constantly remind us that they only get one bite at the apple.
Thanks for the clarification. Yes, I fully & completely agree that the authorities should be certain beyond a doubt that someone committed a crime before arresting/charging them. Unfortunately, we all know there were/are innocent people in prison - which is something that should never happen.
I'm just surprised that it took 25 years in this case, given that PF was always felt to be the #1 suspect. Of course, we don't really know what led up to this arrest; until more details are given out, everything we discuss is just speculative.
Last edited: