Who said anything about blood? Most sexual homicides involve manual strangulation.Hope you don't take offense to your defense.
You still have Law Enforcement digging on a random hill without a single lead so who is the problem?
Your presumption that the cadaver dogs were able to come up with a hit shows the "only evidence" is in his room is a joke and a speculation drummed up by using the media to sensationalize the case.
You telling me that they smelled something in his room and that proves that she was even there?
Then you are telling me that there was no bloody crime scene, but the dogs told you that she was murdered by him in his room?
Then you are telling me that the woman being 6'1" tall, was picked up and moved, and then buried in the mother's backyard some miles away in another town nearby?
All within a short time period without anyone seeing anything at the school campus, or in the neighborhood near the mother's house?
And this is your logic?
This is nothing but a suspicion that was drummed up and turned into a popular media sensation......who invented the theory that it was in his mother's backyard?
How many people are all threatening the suspect together in a glee club without spending a single second out searching for her?
Also Ozoner, the suspicion that I have raised to the family is that she was out hiking a trail and was murdered. They even said that she was active, and that it was one of their suspicions as well, seeing that they could not find anything on the campus, it makes a lot of sense that she would be off campus somewhere nearby.
There is a history of violence with Paul throughout school from a young age, and plenty of women have come forward accusing Paul of sexual assaultThese were kids in school and one was drunk AF, passed out on the lawn. 3 people helped her home. One walked a bit further with her and she split. They say there is no proof that she made it to her dorm that night, but they also assert that she could have just gone hiking. So they don't know what happened and agree that she is nowhere on campus after searching everywhere.
Another thing is the kid was never known to be violent at all in school so the motive that he was raping her in a "sexual homicide" is your own fantasy IMO. There is no evidence seen so far that says he was raping her. To then go off the tangent itself and propose that his "behavior around women" shows a pattern? He was a kid in school that is being accused of killing someone. Have any of these women come forward to say that they were abducted and murdered as well? Was there a pattern to this with the accusers saying that he even TRIED to abduct them? No there isn't.
Don't talk about sanity when you fantasize about these events without a scent of proof
These were kids in school and one was drunk AF, passed out on the lawn. 3 people helped her home. One walked a bit further with her and she split. They say there is no proof that she made it to her dorm that night, but they also assert that she could have just gone hiking. So they don't know what happened and agree that she is nowhere on campus after searching everywhere.
Another thing is the kid was never known to be violent at all in school so the motive that he was raping her in a "sexual homicide" is your own fantasy IMO. There is no evidence seen so far that says he was raping her. To then go off the tangent itself and propose that his "behavior around women" shows a pattern? He was a kid in school that is being accused of killing someone. Have any of these women come forward to say that they were abducted and murdered as well? Was there a pattern to this with the accusers saying that he even TRIED to abduct them? No there isn't.
Don't talk about sanity when you fantasize about these events without a scent of proof
So your “logical” theory is that a girl so drunk she couldn’t stand without help...went on a hike? I can’t even understand where you are going with this. Do you think she made it back to her room? Where is the roommates key? She was last seen wearing shorts and a crop top. Do you think she went hiking in those? That a girl too drunk to walk wanted to scale a mountain in those? Or do you think no one noticed her clothes were back in the room or her shoes had changed and that she had rearranged her bed to make it look like it was before she left? And that she has a liver of a god and doesn’t feel hungover in the slightest?
What do you make of Paul having a black eye the weekend of her disappearance? And changing the story about how he got it multiple times?
Also, not having a criminal background or having a history of violence does not mean you can’t kill. I implore you to look at...well, I can’t even begin to think of all the examples of murders committed by people with no prior offenses or history of violence. Just earlier this month a sweet young girl named Faye was murdered by her neighbor. His only conviction was a traffic violation of failing to dim his lights. Before that, nothing. If everyone needed a prior conviction before being a suspect...well that’s just ludicrous
Not sure if you’ve researched this case in detail, or listened to the podcast but a lot of the things you are saying are simply not true. The police/fbi never created the hike story, that was randomly thrown out in the very early days of her disappearance by cal poly . It’s never been said Kristin was an avid hiker- yes she loved the outdoors but specifically the beach and spent her time there. The things about Paul not being convicted for a sex crime bc he was found innocent is a complete fabrication, no one ever pressed charges and side note, your implication that these women made these stories up is very offensive and off base. I understand that you offer an unconventional service to these cases that may have led to breaks in cases in the past, but completely disregarding facts in this case and asserting that Paul is being the target of a witch hunt is irresponsible. At least quote and discuss facts when laying out your theories...It was even proposed by the police and FBI that she was possibly hiking or camping as it was the holiday weekend there. I think she must have made it to her room, as she was conscious enough to convince the others to leave her alone with Paul, and they didn't really have the need to walk her all the way back. All I said was that she was hammered and passed out napping on the lawn en route to her own dorm so she was obviously motivated to move on her own and wasn't so trashed she had to be carried from the party there. She also could have met someone at the party that followed her home to surprise her there, or even someone she met having planned to go out with her on a hike, as she was a known active hiker and loved the outdoors....nobody knows the details but is lost arguing about how some freaked out kid is reacting to all of these questions. They also seem to be pretty arcane in their questions and answers in the interviews about his black eye and his alibi so much that he went and got a lawyer seeing them trying to frame him and then went dark on the questions. To explain the black eye? Maybe he told the people that saw him a story so not to seem like an idiot having smashed it on the wheel of his car, and when he talked to the cops he told them just that.
I said that the number of accusations thrown at the kid are based on the creation of the image of a "monster" and other exaggerations about events from the times that came about YEARS later....and the use of that to claim he was a patterned freak his whole life, even when he walked her halfway home, is one of these suspicions generated by illogical use of context of his actions throughout a timeline. How can he be a patterned killer if there was no other threat made to the so called victims of his other accusations. It seems more fitting that the beat those charges as well due to his evident innocence in the case and that there has been a continued railroading driving a public mob on the guy.
Think about all the times these sites are used to generate a movement that ends up being disproven or proven otherwise ? There is no "I told you so" online, and no accountability for people that sit there and speculate about someone that they have never met.
I haven’t gotten that impression of anyone?Ever wonder if anyone posting here IS Paul? Just saying.
most likely some of his DNA evidence or things specific to the caseUnless they think she's buried near the house, what would they reasonably expect to still be there 24 years later?