GUILTY CA - Laci Peterson, 27, pregnant, Modesto, 24 Dec 2002 #2

[mickey2942]

It is sad that the Innocence Project cannot find someone more deserving of their resources.

 

[texaslb218]

It is sad that the Innocence Project cannot find someone more deserving of their resources.

Did they choose this case because of the amount of publicity it would generate? And I have no doubt at all of murderer SP's guilt.

 

[mickey2942]

Did they choose this case because of the amount of publicity it would generate? And I have no doubt at all of murderer SP's guilt.

I don't know. But he belongs in prison. His story makes no sense. And if he went fishing, how surprising it is that his dead wife and baby son, end up washed up in the bay. What a coincidence!

I have zero doubt about the fact that he killed his pregnant wife. Same as Chris Watts, and Dr. Jeffrey Mcdonald.

 

[LinasK]

I don't know. But he belongs in prison. His story makes no sense. And if he went fishing, how surprising it is that his dead wife and baby son, end up washed up in the bay. What a coincidence!

I have zero doubt about the fact that he killed his pregnant wife. Same as Chris Watts, and Dr. Jeffrey Mcdonald.

Telling Amber Frey 3 weeks in advance of Laci's death is what ultimately does it for me. The nail in the coffin. That blows away any burglar theory, oh and him being caught with a disguise and $10,000 cash and camping gear 30 miles from the Mexican border too...

 

[I am not Sherlock H.]

Telling Amber Frey 3 weeks in advance of Laci's death is what ultimately does it for me. The nail in the coffin. That blows away any burglar theory, oh and him being caught with a disguise and $10,000 cash and camping gear 30 miles from the Mexican border too...

Yes LinasK^^^! ….. that was a critical and pivotal factor often overlooked. And didn’t IIRC SP call Ms. Frey from ‘Paris’? (Oh that’s right, no he was actually quite close it seemed and in the US. And he was not in Paris, France.)

As others have said, it is so unfortunate that resources being spent here could be used to better and further other more worthy and just causes IMO. MOO

 

[Gigiky]

He also told AF it would be his first Christmas alone since his wife died. If I remember he told AF that a few days before Laci actually went missing.

 

[LinasK]

He was at one of the searches for Laci where he called Amber from, and blamed the background noise on "fireworks in Paris".

 

[LinasK]

He also told AF it would be his first Christmas alone since his wife died. If I remember he told AF that a few days before Laci actually went missing.

It was Dec. 9th, more than a few days before Christmas.

 

[Gigiky]

A Neighbor testifying that SP called and left a message on their recorder at 5:30 pm on Dec. 24th, asking if him or his wife had seen Laci, YESTERDAY or today. I believe that neighbor was crying during his testimony. I can't remember who was the last person to see or talk to Laci other than SP on the 23th.
I will have to go back and check it out.

 

[Gigiky]

what I find really interesting is that SP sister in law is getting a Law degree so that if SP is granted a new trail she can be part of his defense. She is studying Law at California Western school of Law.
I'm just thinking out loud when I wonder if his sister in law played any part in getting (LAIP) to take SP case.

 

[otto]

what I find really interesting is that SP sister in law is getting a Law degree so that if SP is granted a new trail she can be part of his defense. She is studying Law at California Western school of Law.
I'm just thinking out loud when I wonder if his sister in law played any part in getting (LAIP) to take SP case.

It's not surprising that Scott Peterson's father is desperately clinging to the goal of getting his son out of jail 20 years after the fact. He sold warehouses on the bay to pay for Scott's defence. Now someone in the family is getting a law degree to argue the point. It won't make any difference.

Lee Peterson married a woman who gave up most of her children for adoption. The child they had together was neglected during early childhood. Per Jackie Peterson, she left him in a playpen for 2 years while she worked retail. She was an abandoned child as well.

It seems likely that Lee Peterson's daughter in law was instrumental in guiding the LA Innocence Project to her pet project.

 

[LinasK]

what I find really interesting is that SP sister in law is getting a Law degree so that if SP is granted a new trail she can be part of his defense. She is studying Law at California Western school of Law.
I'm just thinking out loud when I wonder if his sister in law played any part in getting (LAIP) to take SP case.

You don't start out as an Appelate Lawyer, that takes many years of experience, and there's no guarantee that she will even pass the bar. Good Luck with that!

 

[BUF]

what I find really interesting is that SP sister in law is getting a Law degree so that if SP is granted a new trail she can be part of his defense. She is studying Law at California Western school of Law.
I'm just thinking out loud when I wonder if his sister in law played any part in getting (LAIP) to take SP case.

Oh pleez, wasn’t that a movie? Oh yes “Conviction” with Hillary Swank and Sam Rockwell. Is that where she got the idea from?

 

[Gigiky]

BUF, I thought the exact same thing.

 

[NetSleuth_41]

IMO, Scott slipped up on the fishing alibi to the investigator. He already told someone he went golfing. Immediately after he told the investigator he went fishing, he brings up he was going to go golfing but decided against it (I think he mentioned weather for changing his mind, but I could be wrong). IMOO, he never had to say anything about his change of plans from golfing to fishing but he realized his mistake at that moment; so, he had to say he changed plans as he knew he had already told someone else he went golfing.

Fair point. Appreciate this perspective. In response, I would say that let's say he slipped up in what he told Investigators - it doesn't change the fact that when asked where he went fishing, he was honest as to approximately where he was and I think even the most unintelligent criminal, would not tell Investigators they were fishing in the same area or same location/approx area where they disposed of a body. That makes 0 sense to me.

 

[I am not Sherlock H.]

Fair point. Appreciate this perspective. In response, I would say that let's say he slipped up in what he told Investigators - it doesn't change the fact that when asked where he went fishing, he was honest as to approximately where he was and I think even the most unintelligent criminal, would not tell Investigators they were fishing in the same area or same location/approx area where they disposed of a body. That makes 0 sense to me.

Following criminal cases and murder cases, it is apparent IMO that things often do not make sense. And there is no merit to trying to understand another’s motives or actions. I am often told it is a ‘fool’s errand’. IMO this convicted murderer is exactly where he should be based on the evidence and trial.

In answer to the specific question this was posted on August 24, 2024. And in my estimation nothing has changed from that. MOO

Post in thread 'CA - Laci Peterson, 27, pregnant, Modesto, 24 Dec 2002 #2'
GUILTY - CA - Laci Peterson, 27, pregnant, Modesto, 24 Dec 2002 #2

 

[Megnut]

He was confident in his technique IMO. He thought his anchors would keep his secret.

I doubt he volunteered having gone finishing. Likely he knew they knew that much so he had to abandon golf and cop to boating. He didn't offer it to be generous.

 JMO