Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His ride-or-die SIL Janey speaks out. Bunch of nonsense, imo.
Scott Peterson's sister-in-law claims that his wife Laci was murdered by burglars | Daily Mail Online
If I'm not mistaken, he is being retried for the sentencing phase only.A shame if he he is retried and found not guilty. I believe he did it.
If I'm not mistaken, he is being retried for the sentencing phase only.
Sorry I know someone just asked this but I am still confused - at these upcoming hearings, can his attorneys argue for a new criminal trial?
Was that the Forty Eight Hours episode? I thought they did a really poor job interviewing the sister-in-law.I saw an interview with the sis-in-law in her legal 'war room'. She had all these 'post its' with 'witnesses' names on them, claiming several people saw her the day, AFTER SP dad gone fishing.
So why didn't the defense team call on those witnesses. The prosecution said they weren't called because their stories were inconsistent with each others, and that is because there were 2 other similar women who walked golden retrievers, and one was pregnant also. So these sighting are not 100% credible.
But the story the defense is telling, about how Lacey and the baby ended up in the SF Bay, is so ridiculous. They claim the petty thieves kept the body after killing her that day---and much later, after it was reported that SP was fishing in the bay, they drove an hour and a half to dump the body there to frame him.
YES, it was the 48 Hrs episode. And NO, they didn't ask here any hard questions.Was that the Forty Eight Hours episode? I thought they did a really poor job interviewing the sister-in-law.
They didn't ask her any questions about the day he was arrested with his dyed hair, his brother's ID, all the cash he had on him and several burner phones. Nor did they ask her anything about Amber Frye. I'd like to know what she has on her post-its about those things.
Here's a link to watch the episode if anyone is interestedYES, it was the 48 Hrs episode. And NO, they didn't ask here any hard questions.
As to the ones you just asked, about WHY he dyed his hair, had 20 k in cash, and was almost to the Mexican border with his burner phones........I have seen FB 'answers ' for those questions on the
Scott Is Innocent site....
They say his hair got sun bleached, he had that cash cuz he just sold his car, or some BS like that....and he has to have burner phones because the cops were after him and spying on him, etc etc...And some even said 'So What if he was running off to Mexico? He is being framed and needed to escape.'
One of the most damning things is that he told his girlfriend that 'this was the 1st Christmas since his wife had gone...' or something like that.
And during his missing wife's vigil, he is on the phone, telling Amber he is watching fireworks at the Eiffel Tower. He is such a cold hearted liar.
I saw an interview with the sis-in-law in her legal 'war room'. She had all these 'post its' with 'witnesses' names on them, claiming several people saw her the day, AFTER SP dad gone fishing.
So why didn't the defense team call on those witnesses. The prosecution said they weren't called because their stories were inconsistent with each others, and that is because there were 2 other similar women who walked golden retrievers, and one was pregnant also. So these sighting are not 100% credible.
But the story the defense is telling, about how Lacey and the baby ended up in the SF Bay, is so ridiculous. They claim the petty thieves kept the body after killing her that day---and much later, after it was reported that SP was fishing in the bay, they drove an hour and a half to dump the body there to frame him.