I saw Mark Geragos in a TV video as he walking in public, years after the trial, being asked by a news reporter why he didn't call the witnesses to trial who said they saw Laci walking her dog that morning. He said, and I paraphrase, that he couldn't call them because their witness statements varied and he thought this would benefit the prosecutors more than the defense. I have tried to find this video but haven't been successful. Based on this, it was his decision to not call witnesses who thought they saw Laci and her dog that morning.
The technical term is called "false sightings". There are many brunette women who walk dogs but aren't Laci.Thank you for that information: Translated - the witnesses had no credibility and would harm the defense--- Scott Peterson supporters always talk about those alleged witnesses who saw her walking her dog-- yeah right- If they were credible they would have been called.
Scott Peterson moved off California's death row
Scott Peterson has been moved off death row more than two years after the California Supreme Court overturned his death sentence for killing his pregnant wife two decades ago, corrections officials said Monday.www.kcra.com
Two years after his death sentence was overturned Scott Peterson has been moved from San Quentin to another prison. check out his mug shot recently taken- he doesn't look so cute now, does he? He is 50 now- hope his conviction stands.
I saw this also on the news. I don't think asking for a retrial will work in his favor. He has now been moved into general population housing where there is less security from other prisonersView attachment 375238
evil waste of space IMO.
No question there is ample evidence of his guilt but the defense is attempting to negate all that by way of a technicality involving a juror--that she should not have been on that jury and that she was biased against him because of her history-I hope this weak attempt to get another trial fails.Other than the one juror who the defense now objects to, what will be their evidence that he is not guilty?
"The California Supreme Court ruled that the most compelling evidence of Peterson’s guilt included:
- “Laci’s and Conner’s bodies washed ashore 90 miles from their home but within sight of where Peterson admitted he went fishing the day they disappeared.”
- “Research Peterson did on bay currents in the weeks preceding her disappearance and the fishing boat he bought but mentioned to no one.”
- “Peterson’s inability to explain what he was fishing for in the middle of the day.”
- “His repeated subsequent surreptitious trips to the marina in the weeks after her disappearance.
- “The many steps he took in the weeks after she went missing — selling her car, exploring sale of the house, turning the nursery into a storage room — that indicated he already knew Laci and Conner were never coming back.” KRON4 news
Yet Geragos wanted that particular juror on the case. He could have challenged and had her striken in jury selection.No question there is ample evidence of his guilt but the defense is attempting to negate all that by way of a technicality involving a juror--that she should not have been on that jury and that she was biased against him because of her history-I hope this weak attempt to get another trial fails.
And points out that they located the pregnant woman who was walking her dog- it wasn't Laci, even if said pregnant woman was wearing a white top and black pants.Yeah I think Geragos knew that was not going to fly.
Toward the end, Dr Phil nails it.
He exposes Peterson SIL’s word salad on Laci sightings.
MOO
Wow! Coming up on 20 years this Christmas Eve.Statements by Laci's family to Scott Peterson
It was an emotional day in court as the death penalty was handed to Scott Peterson. Here are some quotes from Laci Peterson's family on their pain.www.nbcnews.com
Hard to believe this was 2005 when the family spoke to Scott.
Laci was murdered December 24, 2002 (aged 27)
Conner was murdered December 24, 2002
(age 34 weeks gestation)
MOO
Yet Geragos wanted that particular juror on the case. He could have challenged and had her striken in jury selection.
Thank you Niner!Never mind - this article has the time.
Judge to rule on Scott Peterson retrial
A California judge will determine if Scott Peterson will get a retrial for killing his pregnant wife, Laci Peterson and the couple's unborn son, Connor.www.courttv.com
Judge Anne-Christine Massullo will announce her decision on Friday, December 2, 2022 at 1pm ET/10am PT. Watch Court TV and CourtTV.com for the latest on Scott Peterson.
I think this is a good ruling, it costs a lot to bring a defendant to court for a hearing, I wonder if anything can be read into her decision to not have the hearing and just to issue the ruling, I think it would be a bigger impact if she vacates his conviction,
Nov. 28, 2022
Scott Peterson was scheduled to go to San Mateo Superior Court on Friday, and learn during a hearing that was to be broadcast live on television, whether his murder convictions would be overturned.
But the hearing was vacated Monday in an order by Judge Anne-Christine Massullo. The order said she will instead issue a written ruling only. The order also vacated her previous order to transfer Peterson from prison to the San Mateo County jail so he could be present for the hearing. Instead, he will remain in prison and await word from his attorneys.
The ruling gave no explanation for her decision to vacate the hearing, which was scheduled earlier this month. Nor did it say when the written ruling would be issued, other than that it will be before the Dec. 16 deadline.