Admittedly, my depiction was sensational. My apologies to the area. Nevertheless, I muted the depiction portrayed by MSM.
Is it not the case that an intruder commits an intrusion? I did not intend any meaning beyond that.
LE would be remiss to not search the Internet for information; e.g. Boston.
My comment was aimed at "local" social networking media. Someone from the area might comment with much more authority than me. My understanding is that there is not a daily newspaper specifically serving this area. People may rely on local social media postings for detailed information about local events. I suspect that posts were voluntarily removed, if they were removed, by the host or by users with editorial rights.
When I first learned that there was a concern about "derogatory" postings I searched the Internet to determine what may have inspired the request. Someone else, who posts on this forum, did the same. I could not find anything on the Internet that was obviously derogatory. There was an article from a Bismark news source that posted the wrong photo. A photo of a missing girl from the Midwest was posted and misidentified. Oddly, this person's appearance is similar to LF.
In the age of the Patriot Act, CISPA, and facilities to be built in Utah, clensing of the Internet may not be a far fetched possibility. Nevertheless, my bet is that local posts about this case, if they were removed, were done so voluntarily. This appears to be the case for the Sheriff's advisory comments.