(Sorry if this has been covered, but I don't have time to read the dozens of posts from the last 2 days.)
With the total absence of info given by the police on any evidence used to arrest the son, I offer this theory:
Before the kid's arrest they took out as evidence wood (I believe an article says it was firewood) from the family's garage. This leads me to theorize that the son may have burned his bloody clothes and other evidence in the family fireplace before the cops came.
Thus, the cops may have found DNA or blood from him or Leila in the remaining woodpile. If they found traces of Leila's blood mixed with IF's DNA on the wood that would be very incriminating evidence that he grabbed the wood after Leila's murder to burn. And if he told the cops that he didn't start a fire in the fireplace after he found his sister's body, then they would know they caught him in a major lie. :websleuther:
Thoughts?
With the total absence of info given by the police on any evidence used to arrest the son, I offer this theory:
Before the kid's arrest they took out as evidence wood (I believe an article says it was firewood) from the family's garage. This leads me to theorize that the son may have burned his bloody clothes and other evidence in the family fireplace before the cops came.
Thus, the cops may have found DNA or blood from him or Leila in the remaining woodpile. If they found traces of Leila's blood mixed with IF's DNA on the wood that would be very incriminating evidence that he grabbed the wood after Leila's murder to burn. And if he told the cops that he didn't start a fire in the fireplace after he found his sister's body, then they would know they caught him in a major lie. :websleuther:
Thoughts?