GUILTY CA - Leila Fowler, 8, murdered, 12yo charged, Valley Springs, 27 Apr 2013 - #3

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I now realize what people meant when they say that IF looks older than 12. He's about the same height as Justin, who's 19, and noticeably taller/bigger than the little girl in the pink (Leila's best friend). However, in the family pictures, I think he did look his age.

Oops! I guess I was wrong about the little girl in pink. I noticed she wasnt in the family photo but I saw a news video of her in which the reporter described her as crying because she will never see her sister again! 'So Leila had an older sister but not younger one.

People who believe in the system wouldn't likely object to the family using their money for a legal defense. The money is given to help the family. Certainly the family is served by a full and fair defense for whomever the defendant may be. Since it's their son, it seems particularly important that the trial, verdict, sentencing be based on the best circumstances possible.

I know this is idealistic, but isn't that how it's supposed to work?

I absolutely would NOT agree to money I had donated to support a grieving family suddenly being used for a private, legal defense. And I think if a family who obtained funds from the public before an arrest later used those funds for such a defense, would be horrid.

Sadly, I would have to agree that you are probably not out of the ordinary. What system of justice do you prefer over ours?

Wait, what? Since when does supporting our system of justice require we pay for private criminal defenses? I pay my tax dollars for public defenders. I'm sorry but I;m not required to fund someone else's criminal defense on top of that.

Ed Kemper killed both his grandparents at 15, was incarcerated and released, then went on to become a serial killer before murdering his mom and handing himself in ...

Edmund Kemper - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wow. So there is one.
 
I believe the bulk of the money was donated BEFORE the arrest, so the general public was genuinely trying to help with expenses for the death of their daughter. Envisioning the hiring of a defense attorney wasn't on the radar.

But I'll keep that in mind the next time someone needs a donation.

I am well aware that the bulk of the money was donated before.
However, the possibility that a family member was involved was there when the money was donated.

A link was provided earlier that the funeral was paid for, which usually happens in these cases.
I have a family member in the funeral home business, they have paid for a few of these funerals. :twocents:

A family member still could have spent the money however they wanted even if the brother wasn't arrested.

Would people want the money back if a family member had a gambling or alcohol history?
Or if a family member had a criminal history? Or political or religious affiliations they didn't like?

My point is, once you donate your money to a private citizen you cannot control how it is spent.
You CAN have some control if you donate to a funeral home, donate gas cards, or store cards, etc. :twocents:

To ask for donated money back because there is a chance it might be used for a purpose you didn't intend?
That's like asking for an outfit back because they are wearing it somewhere you don't approve. :twocents:
That seems wrong to me but I was always taught that when I give gifts, it is with no strings attached. :seeya:
 
I'm with you MsF.
 
Yes-that is right. Unless the place who took your money said it was to be used for one specific purpose and it was used for something completely different. If these types of issues are a major concern for a donator-they should be careful to read any fine print or look up the charter, etc...

In this case, it seemed to be a general fund that was opened up to assist the family-there never seemed to be any specific promises as to what the money was to be spent on either.

Also, people should remember that often times, a fund raiser may actually end up raising more funds than actually required. At that point-I would imagine the fund would be closed, but any excess funds could be spent on whatever the family would like.

The fund is not always closed if it makes more than needed.
There was a recent situation where a toddler allegedly died from sudden unexplained death.
It didn't make the news so nobody was ever given a satisfactory answer as to the cause of death.

The parents needed to raise $5,000 for the funeral costs. (Allegedly.)
They didn't stop the fundraiser until it stopped making money at $20,000.
They now have new furniture, a new big screen TV, a new vehicle... life sustaining things like that. :facepalm:

Sometimes even real tragedies bring out the greed in people.
That's why I always find it's best to donate directly to the funeral home.
Or donate in a way that you know it goes for what you intended.
That allows you to donate and still protect your donation. :seeya:
 
Yes, and now that you've brought it up - if my daughter had been stabbed to death by my son I wouldn't be visiting. I probably wouldn't sit behind him in court either. But that's me.

I don't know what I would do but wouldn't want to take a guess, in the event I am in their shoes someday!
 
There are other juveniles who have killed again .. eg:

Dalton Prejean -- killed a taxi driver when he was 14, . When he was 17, he gunned down a state trooper in Lafayette, Louisiana. Despite protests from the American Civil Liberties Union and other abolitionist groups, Prejean was executed for the second murder on May 18, 1990.
Source: http://www.wesleylowe.com/repoff.html

There is a book written by Carol Anne Davis, titled 'Children Who Kill.' in it there is a whole chapter titled "Children Who Kill and then Kill Again as Adults." So it does happen.

Children Who Kill: Profiles of Pre-teen and Teenage Killers (2003): Carol Anne Davis: 9780749006938: Amazon.com: Books

Found an interesting playlist here:
[video=youtube;LhFvTyc9z04]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhFvTyc9z04&list=PL34C25BFC0B8DFAA0[/video]

Each child / case / state is different of course ... here's hoping for the best in this case, and thoughts go to the family.
 
Let's face it - Americans donate through their tax dollars to fund things through the government that would make all of us cringe. Someone giving 20 or 50 dollars for this family should think of the bigger picture. JMO.

For the record, I give without strings and I NEVER loan money. If I can afford it, I give it with no expectation it will be repaid. Surprisingly, the people I've given money to after they asked for a loan... do repay it.

Life is too short to be so petty over money. IMO




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Like I have said in my previous posts. I believe murderers should be lock up in jail for the rest of their life. If this 12 year olds boy is truely guilty, I am all support to lock him up away from the society, so he won't hurt another child again.

But then I also hope this won't turn out to be like the Stephanie Crown case, where her brother Micheal Crown was falsely lock up and charged with murder. Many years later, we found out that he is innocent, and it turn out a homeless man killed his sister.

I'm sorry if I remember wrong, I did not follow the Stephanie Crown's case at all, just heard that her brother was falsely accuse of killing his sister.
Anyonoe here followed Stephanie's case maybe can update me. But I feel sad for Micheal, since I totally believe in the U.S fairness (innocent until proven guitly) laws system. Cannot believe they lock up the wrong boy, "sad"

I'm not defending the kid, but I hope LE check throughly with all evidences, it be sad if many years from now we found out that Leila's brother was innocent.
 
Stephanie and Michael Crowe. Brother was accused of her murder and falsely confessed after hours of interrogation. He was completely innocent and the murderer was found to be a transient. Terrible.

Jmo.
 
Like I have said in my previous posts. I believe murderers should be lock up in jail for the rest of their life. If this 12 year olds boy is truely guilty, I am all support to lock him up away from the society, so he won't hurt another child again.

But then I also hope this won't turn out to be like the Stephanie Crown case, where her brother Micheal Crown was falsely lock up and charged with murder. Many years later, we found out that he is innocent, and it turn out a homeless man killed his sister.

I'm sorry if I remember wrong, I did not follow the Stephanie Crown's case at all, just heard that her brother was falsely accuse of killing his sister.
Anyonoe here followed Stephanie's case maybe can update me. But I feel sad for Micheal, since I totally believe in the U.S fairness (innocent until proven guitly) laws system. Cannot believe they lock up the wrong boy, "sad"

I'm not defending the kid, but I hope LE check throughly with all evidences, it be sad if many years from now we found out that Leila's brother was innocent.

Is that the boy who confessed after hours of police interrogation? If so I saw a doco on that recently and I cried for him too .. I am most concerned in this case because of the manner of death .. stabbing is very personal and up close, 21 stab wounds at that. He is very dangerous.
 
I will add that if a piece of information is new to you then it is prudent to ask for a MSM link rather than risk perpetrating a rumor. The responsibility for providing an accepted source for facts has always been placed on the individual posters and no member should be offended at being asked to do so since they agreed to it upon joining.

BBM...Not offended at all. I've been a member since 2005 and always include a link when I am providing info from other sites. The post in question was a quote from another site alleged to be from Priscilla. I posted the quote, the link and a statement saying that we can't confirm whether or not it was really Priscilla posting but thought I'd share it anyway.

If anybody found it newsworthy, fine. If not, fine too.

The poster then asked for some info and said in so many words, not to give him info from the where that person used the nickname Priscilla because he DID NOT consider that a reliable source. I was encouraging the poster to seek out information and share it instead of asking others to seek out info for him and putting restrictions on what he would accept.

I was referring to more than one post being rude. Since the mods asked us not to reply to posts about posts that violate TOS I won't get into that
 
Why would the neighbor say they saw someone fleeing the residence then recant the story? That is scary. Hopefully LE is really looking into this person.

I have begun to think that the neighbor may have seen the 12 YO going off somewhere to hide evidence.
 
We've been traveling, so my apologies if some of this has all ready been addressed (only caught up to page 19, and wanted to address it before the posters themselves forgot about the post!).

Well...the article states that Leila and her brother were home alone on the "night of the murder." So....:facepalm:

Was this perhaps an "away" game, or a game that took families further away than usual? We've been discussing timelines and local ball fields, but this news comment makes me wonder if they'd traveled the night before to a locale further away than we'd considered. Hardly seems likely for such a small town, though; maybe the news article just made a mistake. (In any case, it'd be 'the night of the attack' not 'the night of the murder.')

<snipped by me>

Most very young kid killers actually do not go on to kill again. Mary Bell, the most disturbing of killer kids, killed two boys but never killed again. She was 10 and 11 when she lured and murdered two very young boys (4 and 3). It was premeditated. This most likely was a crime of passion.

Kid killers are so rare that it's hard to have any kind of profile.

I think 12 is far too young to be tried as an adult. It is completely possible for a child that age to do something horrific without being evil. Most kids are still redeemable at that age. Even those with conduct disorder. Dr. Hare showed that young, potentially psychopathic brains can be rehabbed.

But here's the problem: it is highly unlikely that this boy would Receive the intensive, psych help he would need to change. We just had a kid sentenced to age 25 for his murder via a single bullet to his sleeping, highly abusive neo-Nazi fathers head. He was 10 when the murder occurred. The judge refused to place him in an intensive, locked psych facility. Instead, he will be learning from other juvenile offenders and then adults and then released to the world. Scary.

BBM

To me that is the scariest part. He could have been a very sweet boy, it could have been a very unusual sudden flash of anger for him. But now he is going through the system. Once in JD he will be getting a totally different type of education. And no matter what he was really like, he will be very different when he comes out.

Though rare, even not-so-sweet boys age 12 have undergone treatment in centers specially designed for severely psychologically disturbed kids (eg. RAD-diagnosed) and have emerged rehabilitated. A case in point would be the 12yr old boy who had been setting fires since age 5, set an apartment fire resulting in a death, and who confessed at age 12 to setting the Our Lady of the Angels school fire at age 10 (a horrific 1950s tragedy resulting in 95 deaths and many more injuries). After his 'sentence' to the out-of-state facility was completed, he enlisted in the army, served in the Vietnam War, and went on to lead an otherwise undistinguished life--but one without violence. Died in 2004, I believe.

I say, if there's a chance at ALL, give the kid a chance in a suitable psych facility (especially if it is known that his early home environment was one of abuse or neglect, or was otherwise severely deficient, psychologically, as was the case with the fire-setter). It may mean not only his salvation, but that of unknown others down the road.

Not to mention that with the cost of burials, cemetery plots, etc. it is very unlikely that enough money was raised to even cover those costs, let alone enough left over to apply to the defense.

If they are really really concerned, they could make an arrangement with the funeral home and family to pay the funeral home directly and not give the money to the family to disperse. Family could advise them of the amount needed to pay funeral home for instance, then they could go write the funeral home a check. If any monies are left, they could be applied for a headstone.

IIRC, it was reported with a link i believe, upthread, that a donor covered LF's funeral expenses.

But I can imagine other needs for money besides IF's defense: The cost of staying elsewhere during the investigation (even if staying at relative's, there's food, gas, etc), possible leave of absence without pay from job or jobs, and the cost of moving- i can only imagine never, ever wanting to go back to that house again.

There has reportedly been $70,000 raised for the Fowler family according to the Valley Springs Fundraising group on Facebook. This has been done through extensive community involvement including bake sales, benefit concerts, jewelry sales, car washes, etc. On an emotional level, I can see why this community feels "betrayed" -- even if the parents didn't know their son had done this. The amount of effort put forth by this tiny community has been staggering. Some of those who contributed to this fund were themselves deeply hurting financially, and in need of help, but gave sacrificially due to the closeness and unity felt in this small town. To try to refund now would be extraordinarily messy, as much of this was raised through group efforts. But it's a lesson in giving...especially in a day and age where Facebook funding pages spring up almost overnight at every disaster. Give specifically--no blank checks, if you fear regrets later.
 
In regards to the raised money, perhaps the family could do something for the school in memorial of Leila .. new books for the library, or update the grounds in some way, that way all monies raised could go back to the community and still honour their daughter. It would be messy to try and give it back in any other way.
 
I am well aware that the bulk of the money was donated before.
However, the possibility that a family member was involved was there when the money was donated.

A link was provided earlier that the funeral was paid for, which usually happens in these cases.
I have a family member in the funeral home business, they have paid for a few of these funerals. :twocents:H

A family member still could have spent the money however they wanted even if the brother wasn't arrested.

Would people want the money back if a family member had a gambling or alcohol history?
Or if a family member had a criminal history? Or political or religious affiliations they didn't like?

My point is, once you donate your money to a private citizen you cannot control how it is spent.
You CAN have some control if you donate to a funeral home, donate gas cards, or store cards, etc. :twocents:

To ask for donated money back because there is a chance it might be used for a purpose you didn't intend?
That's like asking for an outfit back because they are wearing it somewhere you don't approve. :twocents:
That seems wrong to me but I was always taught that when I give gifts, it is with no strings attached. :seeya:

To me, a donation is vdifferent from a gift. Donations are for specific purposes. Gifts mostly are not. I donate to help a specific cause or to assist specific people
with something specific. Although sometimes I give gifts for a specific thing, generally, I just do it to cause joy.

The tax code even differentiates between the two. Gifts are not tax deductible. Most donations are. And I think if someone donated money to a memorial fund and later found it was used to find a criminal defense for the very perp who murdered the person who made the memorial necessary, they may have a civil cause of action for fraud.

But you are right on the money. If someone donates to a general fund with no stated purpose, they're stuck with the results of that. I agree it's better to donate specific things like a service, or to a specific business for thjngs like funeral costs, etc.
 
Could someone please give me a link to Crystal's fb page, or if that's against , pm me the link? I can't seem to find it with Google. Thank you!
 
I am interested to knowing the exact dates of this knife incident.

He only went to school for one day...I believe it was said he was at school the first day after the murder (Monday). I curious as to why he didn't want to go to school. You would think he would love all the attention he would get.

It was linked earlier in this thread that he stopped coming to school (after the murder) when his classmates started to ask questions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
70
Guests online
171
Total visitors
241

Forum statistics

Threads
608,900
Messages
18,247,435
Members
234,495
Latest member
Indy786
Back
Top