Does anyone else think that the arrest on Anthony Rauda seems a little suspicious and coincidental in timing? I mean, the guy looked pretty clean shaven and very well fed for being called a survalist, especially if they had estimated he had been living off the wild for about 10 years. Don't you think he would be skilled enough (with 10 years of survalist experience) to hunt down his own food and take care of himself before resorting to stealing snacks from a vending machine? I don't know, it just seems like the few details the media has released doesn't sound convincing. Especially if this guy is the killer, don't you think that he would be a little more careful and well thought out as to not get caught? If he had really been this mysterious gunman for over two years, why would he slip up now by committing such a petty crime like stealing food. <modsnipped> I think we should take this arrest with a grain of salt, he might be the burglar, but I don't think he's "the guy". I have a feeling the killer or killers are still out there...