floridamomma
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2013
- Messages
- 2,325
- Reaction score
- 4,922
Is T Trevol or Trezel?
Why am I seeing different names for this father?
Why am I seeing different names for this father?
Bio mom would need resources to pull this off, resources I doubt she has. I'm surprised after LE's actions we are even entertaining anything but the obvious. But then again, stranger things have happened .....
Is T Trevol or Trezel?
Why am I seeing different names for this father?
Well, that's true but if I remember correctly LE did not say that no-one was observed using the gate. He only said the children were not seen using the gate. The father may have used it at one point if he left the house with the van. We also don't know whether or not it was open when police arrived. If it was, someone must have been seen opening it.Yes, they did, but if half of the story is a lie, likely the other half is too! MOO
You didn't find their on air interview to be strange? Two days of wondering where my 3&4 yr olds are would have me medicated and pleading for their safety...This is just my opinion, and I may be completely wrong, but I don't think the adoptive parents had anything to do with this. Something just seems different. I truly hope LE, detectives, whoever look at everyone associated with these two kids. I watched the video interview of the parents again. Something is off and its not with the adoptive parents. JMO.
RSBM..... It seems that this was not an open adoption and the bio family does not keep in touch. MOO
RSBM
An adoption can be "open" but once it's final there is no recourse if the adopting parents decide to not honor the agreement. I believe it's easier for the child, once 18, to track down biological parents but my son is totally at the mercy of his daughter's parents.
In his interview TW stated the children went missing "just before it got dark," around 4:30 or 5:00.I will back almost any adoptive parent because it can be hell trying to help children with trauma heal while family/friends judge from the outside.
However, wow this is so sketchy.
I’m hoping that maaaaaybe the police and family are working quietly to get the children back from someone in the children’s past. That would explain the lack of serious emotion on the parents part, and the lack of searching/communication.
I do want to add, TW stated he looked for the children at 5:30, officers arrived at 5:45. I’m not sure where the “waited too long to call police” theory came from. Hoping this wasn’t all staged. MOO
You’re absolutely right! All good points.Well, that's true but if I remember correctly LE did not say that no-one was observed using the gate. He only said the children were not seen using the gate. The father may have used it at one point if he left the house with the van. We also don't know whether or not it was open when police arrived. If it was, someone must have been seen opening it.
Hopefully police know when he left, how long he was gone and where he went. I wonder if he had his cellphone with him or if the van has GPS.
It is Trezell, he was asked to spell it in his interview.Is T Trevol or Trezel?
Why am I seeing different names for this father?
Legal documents and his Mama spell it "Trezell".Trezel.
Edit: this is a compilation of different members.
1. LE has said no-one has been ruled out so I would assume anyone close to the boys would be POI's.
2. They must have found solid evidence that points to the home since they were able to obtain warrants for the house and the vehicle so quickly.
3. They removed several brown bags and a large duffel bag from the house, while the father stated they only took their phones.
4. They also quickly carried out a second search and collected more evidence which indicates they found something incriminating after the first search of the home and property.
5. LE said the boys scent never left the home and they have not been able to make out how the boys left the house, even though the father implied they left through an open gate after playing in the yard.
6. Neighbors claim to have never seen the children since the family moved there in September.
7. Police say that although they are cooperating, they do not know where the parents are, but someone knows, and they hope they will come forward.
8. The remaining four children have been placed in protective custody.
9. LE are not searching the neighborhood or the desert but instead are concentrating on the home.
10. LE dug up their back yard, with the sound of what a neighbor said sounded like jackhammers.
11. LE showed up with guns drawn.
12. Adoptive parents never use their son's names.
13. AP's didn’t express concern for what their children are going through; no plea i.e.,-“if someone has Orrin and Orson please don’t hurt them, do the right thing and call the authorities, let them come home to their famiy."
There is more to add. I've been MIA for a few days so I know I have missed information.
I interested in knowing if LE observed chalk on the cemented (?) areas where the children were allegedly "playing with chalk". And was the chalk left in that area? The chalk seems important here, unless of course, it was planted post "disappearance".Question- why am I remembering 8pm for cop call? I thought that was reported early on and then someone here later posted some kind of call transcript that showed 8pm? So sorry if we already cleared this up and I missed it.
I think the firewood was integral to TW story for answering when/why/how because he anticipated lots of questions from LE and community.
Everyone knows how sketchy the “I woke up and they were gone, abduction!!” Sounds to LE. Leaving them in the unfenced front yard would have sounded neglectful and they likely thought of neighbor camera placement. He needed a reason for the back gate to be open without sounding neglectful.
With that said, I wouldn’t be surprised if he was on camera collecting wood, as they rehearsed they likely knew they’d need some evidence to corroborate their story. I’d be interested though to see if he quick collected some wood during a completely different timeframe. Moo
If someone took these kids, it would have been caught on camera. The children don't show up on camera leaving, not alone, not taken away by someone.I interested in knowing if LE observed chalk on the cemented (?) areas where the children were allegedly "playing with chalk". And was the chalk left in that area? The chalk seems important here, unless of course, it was planted post "disappearance".
How I want this to NOT be the adoptive parents involved. How I want this to be some well intended but misguided bio member of the family who has whisked these kids off.
Despite my hopes, I have never seen these types of hopeful outcomes after the police have been digging in someone's backyard.
Amateur opinion and speculation
I am trying to get caught up in here now that the holidays are over and am confused on this post.Agree on the "inside the house vs desert" theory. Especially as some people have mentioned, that the boys may have never actually made it to the new home. Can't find any DNA of them in the house? You can be pretty sure they never lived there. MOO