marycontrary
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 28
- Reaction score
- 0
This trial has me glued to my seat...mostly. I found Hearn's family really interesting. I watch on my computer with headphones on and during Mr. Hearns testimony, my son asked if I had the video paused because the guy had the weird deer in the headlights look, no changes in expression and barely moved.
Hearn's mother was questioned about her son's criminal history and defense atty brought up an incident where something exploded and Jonathan was injured. He sort of suggested that her son was making explosives and she down played it as a chemistry set mistake. Later during the trial we hear about the arsenic and the killing of a dog. The defense questions if the poisoning incident actually happened as nothing on his computer or phone shows searches for it except a recipe for banana pudding. The poison was found deeply buried in a shed/chicken coop and it made me wonder if the defense attorney is on to something. He claims he killed a dog, yet cannot say what neighbor it belonged to and then says he did not watch it die. He can't remember how much he used for the dog or the pudding and the story of Sabrina telling Rob to throw the pudding away is just unbelievable. His entire testimony seemed shady and made up. It makes me wonder if he obtained this poison and experimented with it when he was younger. It sort of made me wonder, if he was a budding psychopath as a teenager, playing with poisons and trying to make bombs. At first I thought he was being open and honest and I found him likable and almost felt sorry for him. After hours of listening to him, I get this weird feeling that he's skilled at conversating in a manner that puts people at ease and makes people trust him. Sort of like Ted Bundy. I think of the things he did, fool his family about his level of religiosity and his use of biblical scripture and prayer to manipulate, he says he killed a dog, he went to a bar to meet up with Sabrina with her husband there and the cell conversations they made for an audience (jury). It makes me wonder who manipulated who. I don't think I'm comfortable with him getting out in 25yrs.
I hope Sabrina takes the stand
Hearn's mother was questioned about her son's criminal history and defense atty brought up an incident where something exploded and Jonathan was injured. He sort of suggested that her son was making explosives and she down played it as a chemistry set mistake. Later during the trial we hear about the arsenic and the killing of a dog. The defense questions if the poisoning incident actually happened as nothing on his computer or phone shows searches for it except a recipe for banana pudding. The poison was found deeply buried in a shed/chicken coop and it made me wonder if the defense attorney is on to something. He claims he killed a dog, yet cannot say what neighbor it belonged to and then says he did not watch it die. He can't remember how much he used for the dog or the pudding and the story of Sabrina telling Rob to throw the pudding away is just unbelievable. His entire testimony seemed shady and made up. It makes me wonder if he obtained this poison and experimented with it when he was younger. It sort of made me wonder, if he was a budding psychopath as a teenager, playing with poisons and trying to make bombs. At first I thought he was being open and honest and I found him likable and almost felt sorry for him. After hours of listening to him, I get this weird feeling that he's skilled at conversating in a manner that puts people at ease and makes people trust him. Sort of like Ted Bundy. I think of the things he did, fool his family about his level of religiosity and his use of biblical scripture and prayer to manipulate, he says he killed a dog, he went to a bar to meet up with Sabrina with her husband there and the cell conversations they made for an audience (jury). It makes me wonder who manipulated who. I don't think I'm comfortable with him getting out in 25yrs.
I hope Sabrina takes the stand
