Per this description in The Daily Mail:
"A hood was also placed over her head so she could only see the eyes of her captors, who police describe as two Hispanic women"
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...starved-brutalized-captors.html#ixzz4RkawKj5p
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
I'm having trouble visualizing this. When I think of a hood, I think of something like a pillowcase, or hangman's hood. If SP is wearing that sort of hood, how can she see her captors' eyes, or anything...unless perhaps eye holes are cut out?
But if eyeholes are cut out, then what prevents her from seeing her abductors, head to toe, even while wearing the hood? I'm only reading neck-up descriptions of her captors. Seems she could also offer comparative height, weight, describe their clothing, etc., though, couldn't she?
I've read that the abductors wore bandanas covering most of their faces. But if so, my immediate thought is, why do BOTH captor and captive need to have their heads covered if BOTH can still see each other? IOW, what is the purpose in putting a hood over Sherri's face if she can still see them? Because if the hood was such that she
couldn't see them, then the captors would not need to bother covering their faces. So it would make sense to have either SP hooded, with no eye holes, OR the captors' faces covered. But having both parties wearing headgear that allows both parties to see each other doesn't make sense to me.
One added thought...if the hood did
not have eyeholes cut out, then I would think if SP could see anything at all, it would just have been out the bottom...so she'd have seen the floor, or her shoes, or something below her waist. But I don't get how she would have seen her captors' eyes in that scenario.
I'm finding this description very confusing.