Cal-Sag Channel Search #2

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
On another thread, they are discussing the "other" places where searches might begin now, such as rock quarries in the area.

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=57559&page=2

I posted these pictures over there - not very far from the Canal Search:

PlainfieldIllinois2.jpg


PlainfieldIllinois.jpg

Maybe he's upset because I stated that Drew doesn't seem very intelligent. Well, he doesn't. He sounds dopey to me. I have no problem disparaging the intelligence of a man who went on t.v. and did that very thing to his missing wife.
:crazy:
Sometimes there is a mistaken idea that someone is "intelligent" because they get away with their crimes for so long, and there is this idea that it means he's committed "perfect crimes." But there's no such thing.

Really with Drew, it is more the fact that he was a policeman with alot of friends, which made him "seem" above reproach. People don't like to see their legal defenders in Law Enforcement as possible criminals.

But again - that's not about his intelligence.

The only thing he's good at that I can see is fooling young girls into marrying him, and then disparaging them along with their family and friends for the rest of the marriage. No one is ever "good enough" for his standards, and everyone is a mental case - except him. :slap: In that respect, he sounds just like Scott Peterson.
 
Apparently, in the US there is the "perfect crime." Websleuths and Cold Cases show that.

"In 2004, there were 16,137 cases of murder or nonnegligent manslaughter in the United States. Because 37.4% of these cases went uncleared, around 6,035 people "got away with murder" that year."

http://ask.yahoo.com/20060531.html
 
I wonder if they did find any evidence in the canal and just aren't letting it out at this point?

I also wonder why they feel she is in water..they are continuing to have divers check other water areas?
 
I wonder if they did find any evidence in the canal and just aren't letting it out at this point?

I also wonder why they feel she is in water..they are continuing to have divers check other water areas?
DP's scuba weights are also missing. They think he may have used them to weigh down her body in water. :o
 
DP's scuba weights are also missing. They think he may have used them to weigh down her body in water. :o

Thanks ..I am still hoping that they got some evidence, no matter how minute, out of that canal..just hoping they have more info and evidence then we know about.

I was also wondering since he did answer Cassandra's call, if he didn't think that the location he was currently at was not going to work. Maybe he didn't have her out of the car and in the canal yet? So he may have gone in a whole new direction for disposing of the body?
 
Thanks ..I am still hoping that they got some evidence, no matter how minute, out of that canal..just hoping they have more info and evidence then we know about.

I was also wondering since he did answer Cassandra's call, if he didn't think that the location he was currently at was not going to work. Maybe he didn't have her out of the car and in the canal yet? So he may have gone in a whole new direction for disposing of the body?
That's why I think she's somewhere else too. Maybe after getting that call he knew the location could be traced and he went in another direction and could've turned the phone off?
 
Now that it is officially over with at one part of the "channel", I am wondering if LE will really think that moving to any other area, might be the difference in finding Stacy or not??

If the "ping" was the reason for the search to be centered at this location, and yet nothing was found, what are their options? Rethink how far a "ping" can be? Think that maybe it was a "red herring" from DP?

Personally, I would bring DP in for some official questioning!! They have a lot of "circumstantial evidence" and some hard concrete evidence.
 
I believe that Brodsky has said when DP went in the first time...it was his "formal questioning" and so they don't have a right to bring him back in....but I could again be wrong about that.

I am beginning to believe it is true that DP might have left a lot of "red herrings" as a poster stated early on.
 
SS:

I've been harping on "red herrings" for some time now. Obviously, with all the manpower, money, time, etc. etc. etc. at the Cal Sag channel, to end with no Stacy??

These are experts here, either it was not at the "exact" location where Stacy is at..............or it is a "red herring".
 
I think that they are trying to make use of the sonar technology while they have it.
So, it seems they will be looking at other water areas about which they have gotten tips.
 
SS:

I've been harping on "red herrings" for some time now. Obviously, with all the manpower, money, time, etc. etc. etc. at the Cal Sag channel, to end with no Stacy??

These are experts here, either it was not at the "exact" location where Stacy is at..............or it is a "red herring".
LOL Oh that was you!! Well, I think you could be right. As long as they have reason to believe there is cause to search...they will...even if they think it is another "red herring". They have to be certain. To find out where Stacy is...first they have to know where she is not.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
209
Guests online
389
Total visitors
598

Forum statistics

Threads
608,772
Messages
18,245,670
Members
234,446
Latest member
CuriousDetective
Back
Top