wendiesan
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 3,362
- Reaction score
- 10
Absolutely. They were retiring to a condo in Mexico, and that they would be splitting their time between that Mexico vacation property and a home in Edmonton. It is not acceptable to hide finances. Was this couple bankrupt, vacationing in Mexico, or hoping for the best of both worlds ... in terms of benefit and cost ... a la ... certified general accountant ... et al ... where are the assets?
I'm a little confused by your post, Otto. There is nothing inherently wrong with becoming a "snowbird".
(http://globalnews.ca/news/1453658/m...-were-nathan-obrien-alvin-and-kathryn-liknes/)He’s a golfer and he was just ready to start to retire. He was the same age as me; he had a place down in Mexico and was going to spend six months up there, six months up here. They were just a very normal family. Everything about them was kind of average, really, as far as I know they sure weren’t wealthy. I don’t understand why this happened at all.
In an age of electronic signatures, faxes, text messages, and emails, and at a time when you don't even have to appear in person to complete the sale of a home, wrapping up the details on a business in which AL was only one of several directors could have been done from any location: Edmonton, Calgary, Banff, Jasper, Spokane, Seattle, Los Angeles, or Mexico City. Geographical location would have made little if any difference in anything other than the form of communication being used, IMO. So planning to spend the cold months in Mexico and the warmer months in Canada doesn't seem to be a nefarious plot. Also, JMO, but the property in Edmonton could have been bought to be rented out while AL and KL were in Mexico so it could have been used to generate income.
Given that most bankruptcies in Canada "are eligible for discharge after the minimum period of nine months" (http://www.bankruptcy-canada.ca/bankruptcy/length-of-bankruptcy.htm) it is very likely that both AL and KL had completed all the conditions required to have their bankruptcies discharged well before the disappearances. It's possible that the Calgary house had been sold in order that KL could satisfy the bankruptcy trustees even though it was listed only in AL's name.
(http://metronews.ca/news/calgary/11...e-put-family-first-had-eyes-on-new-adventure/) From what I've read, they each had declared personal bankruptcy only once, and there were no lawsuits pending.The couple, whose love was “rock-solid,” sold the property in May 2013 for about $700,000, but continued living there while getting their affairs in order. The next chapter in their 35-year partnership was to take them south to a family property in Mazatlan, Mexico.
Therefore, their assets were nobody's business but their own, and they were free to use their money as they chose. (My guess is that whatever assets were left following the bankruptcies are clearly listed in AK's and KL's wills.) The bankruptcy of the company of which he was one of the directors shortly before his disappearance would not have affected AL's personal finances. AL's business bankruptcies would have led to the loss of company assets, not his own.
Apparently DG was paid by AL for whatever work he did. (http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/0...glas-garland-over-patent-calgary-family-says/) If DG had expected more money than he received from AL for the work he did on one of AL's patent applications, he had more than enough opportunity to sue him or to dispute the discharge of AL's bankruptcy. In fact, I find it more suspicious that DG did not sue for more money, because that indicates to me that AL had paid him an agreed to amount and had the paperwork to back up his claim.
I don't think that their personal bankruptcies had anything to do with the crimes against AL and KL, and could have had nothing to do with NO's disappearance and presumed murder.
FYI: Since you brought up CGAs:
Trustees may also act as debt counsellors. They may also advise clients to consult an insolvency lawyer.Trustees are the most highly trained and educated Debt Consultants in Canada. Almost all trustees have both an accounting designation and a university degree. In addition, all must complete and pass a rigorous three-year bankruptcy and law course and be investigated by the RCMP before being granted a trustee license. Ongoing professional development is mandatory.
ETA http://www.bankruptcy-canada.ca/bankruptcy-trustee.htm