Lalalacasbah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2014
- Messages
- 3,106
- Reaction score
- 6,662
I'm sure that the two year old is aware of the loss, but he's still a 2 year old. I think the oldest child's mom is making his lunches and looking after his day to day care.
In the murders of cousins Lyric Cook and Elizabeth Collins; Evansdale Iowa, there were younger siblings that needed to continue on a normal life path, and the parents, although still focused on finding the murderer several years later, had to go forward with life. During World War 2, Jewish babies were smothered to death while their parents hid from the Germans. The parents went on to tell the story ... so they went forward with their lives fast - for survival.
Although no one denies the grief of losing a child, younger siblings have to be treated appropriate for their age, and that does not involve grieving for months ... at least, in my opinion, it doesn't seem like an ideal environment for a toddler. Imagine ... tired grieving parents, two year old gives the laptop a drink by pouring a juice box all over the keyboard ... what happens next. Parents can focus on the live child in front of them, put Nathan to rest, and look to the future. That seems to me to be the healthiest thing to do. They will always cherish the memories of their first born child.
I agree, I was just responding as to the topic of why the memorial was held so soon - I was saying they are possibly trying to get back on track with day to day life, going forward and tending to their family by having the memorial as a step towards some type of closure process that will probably never truly end. The memorial might be a first step for them, the first of many.