I guess the time of death may be impossible to prove, but the aerial pictures at least will give some sort of closure.. I'm hoping GD botched his evil plans.Great question. Hadn't even thought of that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess the time of death may be impossible to prove, but the aerial pictures at least will give some sort of closure.. I'm hoping GD botched his evil plans.Great question. Hadn't even thought of that.
Was it ever mentioned as to the DNA found in the 2 teeth which were found at the L residence and which were NOT burned?
ETA: Nevermind, no DNA testimony has taken place yet, so I guess we won't find out until later. I'm guessing that the teeth that HAVE already been discussed are not going to produce results in that regard, else they likely wouldn't have already been mentioned? They did have a dentist on the stand, did he speak about the 2 teeth found inside the home? (I don't recall reading about that, sorry if I missed it, hard to keep up some days).
Was it ever mentioned as to the DNA found in the 2 teeth which were found at the L residence and which were NOT burned?
ETA: Nevermind, no DNA testimony has taken place yet, so I guess we won't find out until later. I'm guessing that the teeth that HAVE already been discussed are not going to produce results in that regard, else they likely wouldn't have already been mentioned? They did have a dentist on the stand, did he speak about the 2 teeth found inside the home? (I don't recall reading about that, sorry if I missed it, hard to keep up some days).
Oh absolutely. I personally don’t hold much stock in AG testimony. He also stated he ate supper with his wife on the 29[SUP]th[/SUP], but his wifes testimony said her and DG ate alone because she had put AG to bed.
A forensic dentist testified that 1 of the teeth found in the L home was consistent with AL. The other tooth he called a "virgin" tooth because it had never been worked on so he was unable to say who it belonged to.
I'm going to assume that the DNA experts will also be able to testify regarding the teeth found in the home.A forensic dentist testified that 1 of the teeth found in the L home was consistent with AL. The other tooth he called a "virgin" tooth because it had never been worked on so he was unable to say who it belonged to.
I don't understand that. Is DNA not obtainable from a tooth? These teeth weren't burned. Did the dentist say he sent it in for DNA testing and this part was left for the DNA expert?
Teeth belonging to the victims at their home doesn't really need proof that they belong to the victims. DNA for the teeth found at the Airdrie property is what is needed.
I don't understand that. Is DNA not obtainable from a tooth? These teeth weren't burned. Did the dentist say he sent it in for DNA testing and this part was left for the DNA expert?
He was a dentist not a DNA expert. We do not know if there is further evidence on the tooth at this point.
I'm going to assume that the DNA experts will also be able to testify regarding the teeth found in the home.
Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk
I wonder if the Crown put them on the stand to show that they really had no idea what was going on.
Sent from my SM-G920W8 using Tapatalk
http://www.metronews.ca/news/calgar...ien-mother-testify-douglas-garland-trial.htmlThe Crown is expected to call 50 witnesses over the next five weeks. Garlands defence has not said if they will call any witnesses yet.
I havent found the photos yet and wondering if this means they took photos of their property on both days?
Is there just one set of photos or two? If only one set then why did they mention two different days.